possumboy
Regular Member
imported post
I'm always look for facts that I can use. I found this and found it interesting.
Looks like that .49 more bullets increase the death toll unbelievably.
"Oh--have I mentioned that a study determined that the average number of rounds fired in a gun battle was 2.04 for a revolver, and 2.53 for a semi-automatic--regardless of magazine capacity (Michael McGonigal, John Cole, William Schwab, Donald Kauder, Michael Rotondo, Peter Angood, “Urban firearm deaths: A five-year perspective”, Journal of Trauma, 1993)? How, exactly, would magazine capacity limits (even in the rather unlikely event that criminals would not find a way around them) save lives?"
http://www.examiner.com/x-2581-St-Louis-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m1d26-What-the-gun-prohibitionists-wont-tell-you-about-magazine-capacity-limits
I'm always look for facts that I can use. I found this and found it interesting.
Looks like that .49 more bullets increase the death toll unbelievably.
"Oh--have I mentioned that a study determined that the average number of rounds fired in a gun battle was 2.04 for a revolver, and 2.53 for a semi-automatic--regardless of magazine capacity (Michael McGonigal, John Cole, William Schwab, Donald Kauder, Michael Rotondo, Peter Angood, “Urban firearm deaths: A five-year perspective”, Journal of Trauma, 1993)? How, exactly, would magazine capacity limits (even in the rather unlikely event that criminals would not find a way around them) save lives?"
http://www.examiner.com/x-2581-St-Louis-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m1d26-What-the-gun-prohibitionists-wont-tell-you-about-magazine-capacity-limits