Support The 2nd
Regular Member
imported post
As I understand it, AG Van Hollen REFUSED to give an opinion to a legislator [Terry Musser] as required in state statute 165.015(1). Therefore, Van Hollen has intentionally failed/refused to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law. State statute 946.12(1) says exactly that and therefore the AG is GUILTY of Misconduct in public office.
Does anybody know who we contact or how we request a special prosecutor to investigateAG Van Hollen for Misconduct in public office?
The state AG being investigated for misconductin office would get the kind of NATIONAL media attention we need.
165.015(1)
edited for grammar and format
As I understand it, AG Van Hollen REFUSED to give an opinion to a legislator [Terry Musser] as required in state statute 165.015(1). Therefore, Van Hollen has intentionally failed/refused to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law. State statute 946.12(1) says exactly that and therefore the AG is GUILTY of Misconduct in public office.
Does anybody know who we contact or how we request a special prosecutor to investigateAG Van Hollen for Misconduct in public office?
The state AG being investigated for misconductin office would get the kind of NATIONAL media attention we need.
165.015(1)
946.12(1)(1) Give opinion to officers. Give his or her opinion in writing, when required, without fee, upon all questions of law submitted to him or her by the legislature, either house thereof or the senate or assembly committee on organization, or by the head of any department of state government.
(1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer's or employee's office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law
edited for grammar and format