Brain-less rants in favor of prior restraint from and due to ignorance.
The charge is not of "open carry" because that is implicitly legal. The charge against the "authorities" is extra-legal harassment. "Trained" assumes facts not in evidence, indeed, denied by the preponderance of the evidence of LEO ignorance of the law.
There are three standards of innocence and only one presumes one's innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, that in criminal court. In civil court one may be required to prove innocence by the mere preponderance of evidence.
Here in the court of public opinion where we play, Brain-less is damned on my say so to a life of blissful ignorance.
Great letter, Mr.. Edmond Foral, it is literate, direct and to the point.