• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Must Read

E

Ebeye

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Messages
28
Location
Logan, UT, ,
imported post

Excellent story! Why couldn't the same argument be used by citing the state constitutional law?

Article I, Section 6. [Right to bear arms.]
The individual right of the people to keep and bear arms for security and defense of self, family, others, property, or the state, as well as for other lawful purposes shall not be infringed; but nothing herein shall prevent the Legislature from defining the lawful use of arms.

http://le.utah.gov/~code/const/htm/00I01_000600.htm

Why isn't the requirement for a CCW considered an infringement?

Seriously! I don't get it!
 
R

rpyne

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
1,072
Location
Provo, Utah, USA
imported post

There is a bill, SB1024, pending in the Idaho legislature that would allow local entities to prohibit firearms in public meetings and libraries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top