• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

SB 78, Parking Lot Pre-emption passes first hearing

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

Sen. Madsen's SB 78, Protection of Constitutional activities in certain private venues, (aka "parking lot pre-emption") passed out of its senate committee with a unanimous positive vote.

Please thank the following senators for supporting this bill that protects employees from being fired over having a lawful gun (or religious material) inside their private car that is parked in company parking lots.

Yeas - 7
Davis, G.
Liljenquist, D.
Mayne, K.
Niederhauser, W.
Urquhart, S.
Valentine, J.
Van Tassell, K.


Remember, this is about life and safety during the daily commute. It is a proper balance of the property rights of the employer, and the life, safety, and property rights of the employee.

We need to watch to avoid backroom efforts to prevent a floor vote in the house.

Charles
 

Kevin Jensen

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,313
Location
Santaquin, Utah, USA
imported post

Thank you for posting this Charles! :celebrate

With the number of co-sponsors on this bill, it should hopefully remain "bullet proof" throughout the session.

A extra special "thank you" to Senators Davis and Mayne. The other five senators that voted in favor are all co-sponsors, but these two were not.

Oh, and the reason you have not heard about this yet Jeremy? Because you are too busy fighting the good fight for open carry in Texas... right???????? Did you know that there are not just one, but ten pieces of legislation this year that could alter gun rights in Utah?

Watch out "Brady Bunch", we're shooting for a perfect zero! :monkey
 

thx997303

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
2,712
Location
Lehi, Utah, USA
imported post

Ten? good ones? :monkey

But yes, I have been getting everyone I run into that likes Open carry, to sign the petition, I signed it as a current resident of Texas, and I have written the applicable parties with my views, and encouraged others to do the same.

But as a Utahn, I don't mind fighting a two front war. :D
 

LovesHisXD45

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
580
Location
, Utah, USA
imported post

Sweet! It's about time I heard some good news. My whole life has been turned upside-down lately, so this is a breath of fresh air!

Kevin
 

rpyne

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
1,072
Location
Provo, Utah, USA
imported post

It passed the Senate on Tuesday by a 25-4-0 vote, but they have now added enough exemptions to make it look like swiss cheese. They have now exempted anyone who can claim hardship, anyone who processes chemicals, any religious organization, any school, and anyone else who can find a federal regulation that might be stretched to apply to them.
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

rpyne wrote:
It passed the Senate on Tuesday by a 25-4-0 vote, but they have now added enough exemptions to make it look like swiss cheese. They have now exempted anyone who can claim hardship, anyone who processes chemicals, any religious organization, any school, and anyone else who can find a federal regulation that might be stretched to apply to them.
The loopholes have dramatically reduced opposition to the bill while also increasing the chances of it surviving any court challenge. It will not provide parking lot pre-emption for every employee in the State. But it should increase the number from those who currently enjoy it by virtue of being employees of the State or one of its subdivisions/agencies to a fair number of private employees.

Even a small step is good if it is in the right direction.
 

Bennelli

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
100
Location
, Utah, USA
imported post

Niederhauser, W is my Senator and i have written him about 2nd Amendment Rights and he assured me 2 months ago that he supports the 2nd A like all of us, he walked the walk and talked the talk good job Niederhauser.
 
Top