• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

State Sovereignty Movment

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Barry & Hillary have mortgaged the farm. Not their farm... our farm.

I don't have to preach to the choir here what this means... The Federal Government has offeredpieces ofThe United Statesas collateral to a foreign Communist government. 'Problem is... the Feds don't own the states. The States do. The Federal Government only exists by mutual argeement among the states... that's why we are a Republic. I'd suggest y'all stock up on ammo 'n somethin' other than handguns.

According to Hal Turner:

The United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!
On February 11, Bloomberg Business News reported that China was seeking "guarantees" for its US Government debt (Story Here) and it now appears they got it. Well placed senior sources at the US Embassy in Beijing CONFIRM the formal written agreement was delivered by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her recent trip to China.

This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take — inside the USA — land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities — to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.

Part Deux


FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS!
Beijing, China --


The United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!

On February 11, Bloomberg Business News reported that China was seeking "guarantees" for its US Government debt (Story Here), and it now appears they got it. Well placed senior sources at the US Embassy in Beijing CONFIRM the formal written agreement was delivered by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her recent trip to China.

This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities - to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.

Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.

This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the USA. An outrage worthy of violent overthrow.

Eminent Domain is the power of government to TAKE private property for public use without the consent of the property owner. Under our Constitution, the government can only "take" when providing "just compensation" for what they've taken.

Who decides what constitutes "just compensation?" The government!

In past "takings" homeowners who felt the government was not paying them enough for property have filed lawsuits. In absolutely every such case, the value placed upon the property by the government was upheld by the courts.

Our federal government has now granted to China, this power to "take" our homes and businesses in the event the US Gov't defaults on its debts.

Let's play this out as a worst case scenario. . . . . .

The US Gov't goes belly-up and China comes in and says, "they owed us $700 Billion in Treasury Notes and another $2 Trillion in actual cash money which is now worthless. We are taking the entire state of Hawaii and the entire state of California in lieu of this bad debt. "

With the stroke of a Chinese chop stick, Hawaii and California -- all the land and buildings in those states -- are now owned by China.

The "taking" would be a "valid public use" because it was "taken" in payment of the public debt!!!!

China could then turn around and declare the value of all that land to be worth. . . . . I dunno, ten cents on a dollar?

If you own a $200,000 house in either state, you get a Chinese check for $20,000.

Needless to say, the property owners would go ballistic and demand "just compensation" for what was taken. Who gets to decide what is "just?" China!

Don't think you got a fair price for what they took? No problem, sue China. You'll lose.

People who live in those states and own their land outright, might be able to negotiate with China to "rent" back what used to be their own property, as long as they continue to pay all their taxes (to China) ; but the land and buildings would belong to China!

This is what our own Government has just done to us and it is the single most vile act of betrayal in the history of human existence.

State Governments Knew This Was Coming

In early February nine U.S. States began the process of re-asserting their Sovereignty pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the US Constitution; declaring null and void any actions by Congress that violated the Constitution.

At the time, I wrote about those state efforts (Here) and wondered why so many states were taking-up such an arcane issue in such a seemingly urgent fashion. I guess now, we know why.

The states were obviously privy to what the feds were planning to do with granting Eminent Domain to China. The states took action to make certain the feds couldn't give away cities or the states themselves!

This situation is going to get VERY ugly, VERY fast as one sovereign power (the feds) tries to literally give away the land of other sovereign powers, (the states). This is the type of thing that starts Civil War.

Our present federal government makes the treachery and betrayal of Benedict Arnold look like child's play.
POSTED BY HALTURNERSHOW.COM AT 2/26/2009 12:54:00 PM 34

_________________
 

wylde007

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
3,035
Location
Va Beach, Occupied VA
imported post

Your avatar represents the ONLY option for relief from this tyranny. We must cast off the destructive and invasive federal leviathan.

There is NO OTHER WAY.

If even a fraction of your post is correct, the underlying fee (legalese) of any property the gummint decides can be conveyed to the Chinese.

Well, here's an idea, how about any FEDERAL PROPERTY go up on the block first. Put your own goddamn collateral in the mix. Your own militaria and UNPAID EXPENSES. How about that, you treasonous scumbags?
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Did ya click on the 'story here' in blue? It's from Bloomberg... MSM ain't touchin' this yet. Yeah... this is actual treason on the part of the government. 'Never thought I'd live to see the day...

"The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered." : Thomas Jerfferson

I don't think even Jefferson could imagine that the government would mortgage the very land of the continentto a foreign power to satisfy the bank's debts. In my mind... every other story... every other thing pales in comparison to the enormity of what has been done here.
 

wylde007

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
3,035
Location
Va Beach, Occupied VA
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
Did ya click on the 'story here' in blue? It's from Bloomberg... MSM ain't touchin' this yet. Yeah... this is actual treason on the part of the government. 'Never thought I'd live to see the day...
Friend, I have not only clicked and read, but forwarded it to several other sites, as well as the provisional government of the CSA.

See, we still consider the South a conquered land occupied by a foreign aggressor. That being said, what do you think might be the first lands offered up as a sacrifice to the new Chinese masters as "collateral"?

Yep, spoils of war.

Again, independence, quick and complete, from the government that has perpetrated this treason is the only solution.

Thank you for the link. Sic Semper Tyrannis and Deo Vindice.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

I fled oppression to theConfederate Territory of Arizona (occupied) and 'became' Arizonan. I've been a legal'resident' of MD, VA, FL, CA and HI... butnever claimed those states as my own.

Being originally from Maryland... I argued the Federal'occupation' back in high school (in thelate '50's). Maryland is a socio-political disaster

We're on the same page...:) The Confederate Government never surrendered.

I am beyond angry... and I am forwarding this infoto everyone I know.
 

demnogis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
911
Location
Orange County, California, USA
imported post

This is outrageous!:cuss:

I highly doubt China would take Alaskan soil, should they attempt to "repo" parts of the states. I think they would go for HI and CA first, as CA imports almost all of it's merch from China.

Keep pushing your state legislators to support your state's affirmation of sovereignty!
 

wylde007

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
3,035
Location
Va Beach, Occupied VA
imported post

Virginia's failed by "unrecorded voice vote" to pass out of the House Rules Committee, because it was introduced AFTER the required submittal period. I received the notice via email from Wagner's office earlier today

Virginia has also passed a state budget accounting for 1.5 billion of federal stimulus funds.

I am seriously concerned that Kaine and his cronies may be complicit in this treason. I have asked point-blank what Wagner's stance is and if he can be counted on as a patriot or a coward.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Rumor?




China Needs U.S. Guarantees for Treasuries, Yu Says (Update2)


Email | Print | [size=[u]A[/u]][/size] [size=[u]A[/u]][/size] [size=[u]A[/u]][/size]

By Belinda Cao and Judy Chen


data

Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) -- China should seek guarantees that its $682 billion holdings of U.S. government debt won’t be eroded by “reckless policies,” said Yu Yongding, a former adviser to the central bank.

The U.S. “should make the Chinese feel confident that the value of the assets at least will not be eroded in a significant way,” Yu, who now heads the World Economics and Politics Institute at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in response to e-mailed questions yesterday from Beijing. He declined to elaborate on the assurances needed by China, the biggest foreign holder of U.S. government debt.

Benchmark 10-year Treasury yields climbed above 3 percent this week on speculation the government will increase borrowing as President Barack Obama pushes his $838 billion stimulus package through Congress. Premier Wen Jiabao said last month his government’s strategy for investing would focus on safeguarding the value of China’s $1.95 trillion foreign reserves.

China may voice its concerns over U.S. government finances and the potential for a weaker dollar when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visits China on Feb. 20, according to He Zhicheng, an economist at Agricultural Bank of China, the nation’s third-largest lender by assets. A People’s Bank of China official, who didn’t wish to be identified, declined to comment on the telephone.

Clinton Talks

“In talks with Clinton, China will ask for a guarantee that the U.S. will support the dollar’s exchange rate and make sure China’s dollar-denominated assets are safe,” said He in Beijing. “That would be one of the prerequisites for more purchases.”

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Jiang Yu said yesterday that talks with Clinton would cover bilateral relations, the financial crisis and international affairs, according to the Xinhua news agency.

The dollar fell 0.6 percent to 89.96 yen today on concern that the U.S. government’s bank-rescue plan will fail to revive lending. Treasuries declined as investors prepared to bid for a record $21 billion sale of 10-year notes today. The yield on the benchmark 10-year note rose three basis points to 2.83 percent.

Currency Reserves

“These comments are some sort of a threat but of course China can never get such a guarantee,” said Thomas Harr, a currency strategist at Standard Chartered Plc in Singapore. The U.S. may assure China that it will clean up the financial system and that it “won’t push for a weaker dollar but they can’t promise not to increase the fiscal deficit,” he said.

U.S. government bonds returned 14 percent last year including price gains and reinvested interest, the most since rallying 18.5 percent in 1995, according to indexes compiled by Merrill Lynch & Co. Concern that the flood of bonds would overwhelm demand caused Treasuries to lose 3.08 percent in January, the steepest drop in almost five years, Merrill data show.

China’s loss of more than $5 billion from investing $10.5 billion of its reserves in New York-based Blackstone Group LP, Morgan Stanley and TPG Inc. since mid-2007 may increase its demand for the relative safety of Treasuries.

“The government will be a net buyer of Treasuries in the short term because there’s no sign they have changed their strategy,” said Zhang Ming, secretary general of the international finance research center at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing. “But personally, I don’t think we should increase holdings because the medium- and long-term risks are quite high.”

Fed Buying

Bill Gross, co-chief investment officer of Pacific Investment Management Co., said on Feb. 5 the Federal Reserve will have to buy Treasuries to curb yields as debt sales increase. Fed officials said Jan. 28 they were “prepared” to buy longer-term Treasuries.

“The biggest concern for China to continue buying U.S. Treasuries is that if Obama’s stimulus doesn’t work out as expected, the Fed may have to print money to cover the deficit,” said Shen Jianguang, a Hong Kong-based economist at China International Capital Corp., partly owned by Morgan Stanley. “That will cause a dollar slump.”

China’s foreign-exchange reserves grew about $40 billion in the fourth quarter, the least since mid-2004, as an end to yuan appreciation since July prompted investors to pull money out.

The world’s third-biggest economy grew 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter, the slowest pace in seven years. Policy makers announced a 4 trillion yuan ($585 billion) economic stimulus plan in November to spur domestic demand.

Linking Disputes

Yu said China has no plans to channel its reserves toward stimulating its own economy because its trade surplus is sufficient to fund any import needs. China’s trade surplus was $39 billion in January.

China “should diversify its reserves away from U.S. Treasuries if the value of China’s foreign-exchange reserves is in danger of being inflated away by the U.S. government’s pump- priming,” he said.

China may try to link trade and currency policy disputes to its future investment in Treasuries, said Lu Zhengwei, an economist in Shanghai at Industrial Bank Co., a Chinese lender partly owned by a unit of HSBC Holdings Plc.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner accused China on Jan. 22 of “manipulating” the yuan to give an unfair advantage to its exporters. The currency has dropped 0.16 percent this year to 6.8342 per dollar, following a 21 percent gain since a peg against the dollar was abandoned in July 2005.

“China can also use this opportunity to get a promise from the U.S. not to make inappropriate requests on bilateral trade and the Chinese yuan,” Lu said. “We can’t afford more yuan appreciation as the economy is facing a serious slowdown.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Belinda Cao in Beijing at lcao4@bloomberg.net; Judy Chen in Shanghai at xchen45@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: February 11, 2009 04:04 EST



adType = "OAS";
Category = "03";
HCat = "x20";
Keys = "null";
Width = "3";
Height = "3";
Tile = "3";

CallAd(adType, HCat, Width, Height, Tile, Keys, Category);




google_ad_client = "pub-1979187633561026";
google_ad_slot = "0643399015";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;










window.google_render_ad();
 

spy1

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
242
Location
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Sonora Rebel - There's not a single statement in that article you keep quoting that verifies or even mentions the "giveaway" of ""eminent domain" to the Chinese in return for them floating more of our bad loans.

wylde007 - I don't need your (or anyone else's) "forgiveness".

Neither do I (or anyone else) need your stupid-ass, personally-offensive remarks.

Of course, that's all you've got. Pete
 

American Rattlesnake

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
281
Location
Oregon, USA
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
Well Spy1... 'reckon y'all better get a thicker skin 'n take those Obama stickers off yer bumper...

There are 28 different bloggers (as far as I would take it...) all carrying this tale...
And all of them are citing the same unverified source.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

If it's true.... It's treason. If it's treason... It'll be denied ever being done. We have a Marxist in the white house and a Communist/Socialist dominated government. It's here... and it's actively pursuing the destruction of the United States of America as we knew it.
 

wylde007

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
3,035
Location
Va Beach, Occupied VA
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
If it's true.... It's treason. If it's treason... It'll be denied ever being done. We have a Marxist in the white house and a Communist/Socialist dominated government. It's here... and it's actively pursuing the destruction of the United States of America as we knew it.
News flash - that took place in 1861.

But you already knew that.
 

spy1

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
242
Location
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
imported post

http://www.halturnershow.blogspot.com/2009/02/feds-grant-eminent-domain-as-collateral.html

lol! This originated with HAL TURNER?!?! Gotta love some of the comments made by some posters within all those threads I just wasted my time reading (really, it was amusing):

" The "here" is a link to the Hal Turner Show Blog where EMINENT DOMAIN is talked about. The Bloomberg article does not even mention EMINENT DOMAIN. Hal Turner is a notorious kook and white supremacist and the EMINENT DOMAIN angle is almost certainly BS."

And this one was priceless: "
Atlas Shrugs Promoting Neo-Nazi Agitprop Blogosphere | Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:25:55 am PST
Here’s a tale of the kind of sheer idiocy that gives blogs a bad name, as Pamela Geller has another meltdown: Atlas Shrugs: OBAMA GRANTS EMINENT DOMAIN RIGHTS TO AMERICAN LAND TO CHINA.
The story may have originated with this Bloomberg article, about the Chinese asking Obama for assurances that the US will support the dollar’s exchange rate, to protect their $682 billion holdings of American debt.
Notice that the words “eminent domain” do not appear in the Bloomberg article. That’s because such a ridiculous thing is not being discussed. By anyone.
So where does Pamela Geller’s latest overheated kookspiracy theory come from? An “unsourced” post at LiveLeak.com: Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts.
Google this title and you discover the real source at the bottom of this ugly little hoax: infamous white supremacist nutjob www.halturnershow.blogspot.com/2009/02/feds-grant-eminent-domain-as-collateral.html+http://www.halturnershow.blogspot.com/2009/02/feds-grant-eminent-domain-as-collateral.html&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=safari]Hal Turner: FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS![/url]
Have a look through the comments posted at that page, if you have a strong stomach.
Someone might want to let Geller know she’s running agitprop from neo-Nazis again.
The Anti-Defamation League has a collection of some of Turner’s other statements: Hal Turner in His Own Words.
Instead of fighting Muslims, we Christians should be rounding up jews [sic] and killing them here in America. We should bomb their Synagogues, burn down their Yeshivas and violently attack them on the street and in their places of business. I advocate extreme violence against jews [sic] because their history as a people make them worthy of being killed. Jews are the lowest form of sub-human garbage. They deserve to be killed.
This is what happens when you don’t care and don’t check where your blog posts come from.
(Hat tip: Thanos.)
A lot of bloggers bit the fish hook on this one!"

:celebrate:cuss::what::banghead:
 

American Rattlesnake

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
281
Location
Oregon, USA
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
If it's true.... It's treason. If it's treason... It'll be denied ever being done. We have a Marxist in the white house and a Communist/Socialist dominated government. It's here... and it's actively pursuing the destruction of the United States of America as we knew it.
And this justifies spreading lies, half truths, and unverified information how?
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Nine states have reaffirmed 10th Amendment or are in process of doing so. 'Think maybe the State legislatures are on to somethin' here? That's not coincidental.

Lies , half truths and disinformation got this Obama poserelected. Lies, half truths and disinformation pour outta the talkin' heads 'n lib newsrags daily. Where there's smoke there's fire. I'm long past bein' a Boy Scout...
 
Top