TFred
Regular Member
imported post
From user profile's message earlier today, highlighting a response from Delegate Bob Marshall on the privacy of CHP holders' personal information, it appears that some delegates do not believe that there is a huge leak, allowing newspapers to print names and streets of CHP holders.
While looking through the code in response to another thread, I noticed this, the first half of the last sentence of Section D, on how to apply for a CHP:
It is very disappointing that our representatives are so unaware of what they speak, and even more so that they are collectively unwilling to provide basic privacy to those who often have very legitimate need to keep this information under wraps.
TFred
ETFix: Spell much?
From user profile's message earlier today, highlighting a response from Delegate Bob Marshall on the privacy of CHP holders' personal information, it appears that some delegates do not believe that there is a huge leak, allowing newspapers to print names and streets of CHP holders.
While looking through the code in response to another thread, I noticed this, the first half of the last sentence of Section D, on how to apply for a CHP:
This is concrete proof that not only is it current practice, the law as it is currently written assumes that CHP applications are public record, available for anyone to review or copy at will.The clerk of court may withhold from public disclosure the social security number contained in a permit application in response to a request to inspect or copy any such permit application,...
It is very disappointing that our representatives are so unaware of what they speak, and even more so that they are collectively unwilling to provide basic privacy to those who often have very legitimate need to keep this information under wraps.
TFred
ETFix: Spell much?