imported post
"Self-defense is not jury nullification, it isa legally recognized defense. Speeding to get someone to the hospital is also a legally recognized defense, it falls under choice of evils.
Nullification is when the person is guilty, and has no legally recognized defense, but is nevertheless found not guilty, because the jury does not agree with the law that is being enforced, or perhaps with the way it is being used in a particular case."
Nice summarization. It is an important distinction, and one that more people need to be aware of. However, it is a power to be used sparingly and only in good conscience, not merely to subvert the system. The majority of people who end up in court in a criminal trial have solid evidence against them, on charges that almost anyone would agree are wrong. The people who end up on drug charges often have a history of other offences and the drug charges are a pile-on to get a bad guy off the street for a little longer.