CathyInBlue
Regular Member
imported post
I'm considering buying real estate in a rural, southern Indiana county. I have concerns that neighbors might object to the noise and get the law involved in some manner. What kind of legal defenses do properly set up ranges for private use only situated on private land outside of any corporation-run town or city have against such busy-bodies?
In addition, as it stands, the real estate resale company that holds the land wants to enforce a "covenant" on it. Not in my lifetime will I consent to such idiocy, but I wonder if anyone else might have encountered similar idiotic encroachments on their private property rights. This particular convenant contains this line.
Now, I have no intention of signing any legal document making any covenant enforceable against me or my private property, and this one contains a number of obvious misspellings and grammaticly tortured passages that would seem to make enforcement problematic, but I can see neighbors who have thinking I had as well, and trying to use that clause against me since firearms are obviously noxious and offensive.
What say you, Indiana OC?
I'm considering buying real estate in a rural, southern Indiana county. I have concerns that neighbors might object to the noise and get the law involved in some manner. What kind of legal defenses do properly set up ranges for private use only situated on private land outside of any corporation-run town or city have against such busy-bodies?
In addition, as it stands, the real estate resale company that holds the land wants to enforce a "covenant" on it. Not in my lifetime will I consent to such idiocy, but I wonder if anyone else might have encountered similar idiotic encroachments on their private property rights. This particular convenant contains this line.
No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot.
Now, I have no intention of signing any legal document making any covenant enforceable against me or my private property, and this one contains a number of obvious misspellings and grammaticly tortured passages that would seem to make enforcement problematic, but I can see neighbors who have thinking I had as well, and trying to use that clause against me since firearms are obviously noxious and offensive.
What say you, Indiana OC?