ixtow
Founder's Club Member
imported post
I've taken a step back from the traditional views of Liberal/Conservative, to objectively examine an anomaly.
What is the mode(s) of failure for communism/liberalism/stalinism/marxism, whatever name you use for it.
In spite of all the talk, protest, war, etc, the only thing that ever seems to beat it, is a collapse under it's own weight. It defeats itself, eventually. The more protracted it is, the more suffering and poverty affect one generation after another.
So, I ask, how is the traditional conservative role of "working your ass off," as admirable as it is, and I do agree on the idea of earning one's own; how does this help? Or does it harm the cause?
The more you work, the more you earn, the more you are taxed to feed a system destined to failure. Your sweat and labor fuels the protraction of a concept that might otherwise collapse under it's own weight much faster. Good work ethic is turned against itself.
Would not the more patriotic thing be, to accelerate the collapse of it, by assisting the burden, instead of fueling it? Let the Nanny State do what it strives to, and thusly fail sooner. Be the burden, not the source of it's continued existence.
Since socialism has only ever been defeated by allowing it to come full circle into failure, a nation of takers that contribute nothing, I present that, adding to the burden of that system is the best way to defeat it.
What do you think?
I've taken a step back from the traditional views of Liberal/Conservative, to objectively examine an anomaly.
What is the mode(s) of failure for communism/liberalism/stalinism/marxism, whatever name you use for it.
In spite of all the talk, protest, war, etc, the only thing that ever seems to beat it, is a collapse under it's own weight. It defeats itself, eventually. The more protracted it is, the more suffering and poverty affect one generation after another.
So, I ask, how is the traditional conservative role of "working your ass off," as admirable as it is, and I do agree on the idea of earning one's own; how does this help? Or does it harm the cause?
The more you work, the more you earn, the more you are taxed to feed a system destined to failure. Your sweat and labor fuels the protraction of a concept that might otherwise collapse under it's own weight much faster. Good work ethic is turned against itself.
Would not the more patriotic thing be, to accelerate the collapse of it, by assisting the burden, instead of fueling it? Let the Nanny State do what it strives to, and thusly fail sooner. Be the burden, not the source of it's continued existence.
Since socialism has only ever been defeated by allowing it to come full circle into failure, a nation of takers that contribute nothing, I present that, adding to the burden of that system is the best way to defeat it.
What do you think?