Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: HR 45 Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 (Introduced in House)

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    59

    Post imported post

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...11k6uSJg:e6813




    This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.

    We just learned yesterday about this on the Peter Boyles radio program.

    Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because it is flying under
    the radar.

    To find out about this - go to any government website and type in HR 45
    or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of
    2009. You will get all the information.

    Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a
    clip or ANY pistol unless:

    *It is registered

    *You are fingerprinted

    *You supply a current Driver's License

    *You supply your Social Security #

    *You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their
    choosing

    *Each update - change or ownership through private or public sale must
    be reported and costs $25 - Failure to do so you automatically lose the
    right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.

    *There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a
    child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child
    under 18.

    They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your
    gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable
    for up to 5 yrs. in prison.

    If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of
    many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more
    people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in
    your family - pass this along.

    Peter Boyles is on this and having guests. Listen to him on KHOW 630
    a.m. in the morning. He suggests the best way to fight this is to tell
    all your friends about it and "spring into action". Also he suggests we
    all join a pro-gun group like the Colorado Rifle Association, hunting
    associations, gun clubs and especially the NRA.

    This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and
    disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a
    little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone
    realizes it. (Did Obama promise transparency? It seems his motives are
    more and more transparent while his methods are hidden in back rooms.)



  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,508

    Post imported post

    Don't keep up much, do ya?



  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    59

    Post imported post

    Well no I do not have to time to "keep up" nearly as much as i would like. In a quick search I didn't see any topics on this bill. Was this already defeated?



    Sorry if i double posted this. I realize the bill was introduced early Janurary but have not done any research of it's current status.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hodgenville, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    1,261

    Post imported post

    denthack wrote:
    Well no I do not have to time to "keep up" nearly as much as i would like. In a quick search I didn't see any topics on this bill. Was this already defeated?



    Sorry if i double posted this. I realize the bill was introduced early Janurary but have not done any research of it's current status.
    Don't worry about it. The DIMS do NOT want this at this time. AFTER 2010.....we'll see.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    National City, CA, ,
    Posts
    239

    Post imported post

    This is the Blair HoltRight to SpeechLicensing & Record ofInternet UseAct of 2009.

    The right to exercise free speech and by extension, the use of internet, shall be legal only if:


    *The individual is duly registered

    *The individual isfingerprinted

    *The individual supplies a current Driver's License

    *The individual suppliesa Social Security #

    *The individualwill submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing

    *Each new language learnedthrough private or publicschool must be reported and costs $25 - Failure to do so you automatically lose the right tospeak and use the internet and are subject up to a year in jail.

    *There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Speakers speaking of topicsnot previously approvedmust be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18.

    *They would have the right to come and inspect that you arespeaking onlywords safe to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 yrs. in prison.


  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    National City, CA, ,
    Posts
    239

    Post imported post

    I can't resist. :what:

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,508

    Post imported post

    denthack wrote:
    Well no I do not have to time to "keep up" nearly as much as i would like. In a quick search I didn't see any topics on this bill. Was this already defeated?
    I'm not trying to be overly snarky, but the fact that you "didn't see any topics on this bill" says you didn't search for it at all, because there have been multiple threads here on OCDO, and in on every other gun-related forum on the internet.

    If you check thomas.loc.gov for the status of this bill, you'll see that it doesn't have a single co-sponsor. It is dead, rotten, and stinking, a sacrificial lamb to those who would test our resolve.

    I don't mean this disparagingly, but if you're someone who only checks email every couple of weeks, you really owe it to yourself and your credibility to do some research before forwarding every WARNING! IMPORTANT! SEND TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!@!! that lands in your inbox.

    http://www.google.com
    http://www.snopes.com


  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hickory, NC, ,
    Posts
    1,025

    Post imported post

    It's still listed as "in committee" on Govtrack. Write all your reps in opposition. Find anyone on the committee from your state and get one to them too. Hopefully it dies in committee. And yeah, it's made it's rounds on the various boards.

  9. #9
    Regular Member TFred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    7,705

    Post imported post

    This bill was introduced in 2007 by the same quacky congressman from Illinois. It died then, it will die now. It's a distraction from real issues.

    Seems to me it would be much more important to contact your congress person and express great displeasure with the new requirement from the DoD to destroy all once fired military brass, which is causing a serious shortage of ammunition on the civilian market.

    TFred


  10. #10
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator longwatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Fauquier Co, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    4,297

    Post imported post

    Dude if Paul Revere was as late as you we'd all be speaking english now.

  11. #11
    Regular Member shad0wfax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Spokane, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,067

    Post imported post

    Chicago, IL (where Blair Holt was killed) already outlawed handguns and had the same style of permitting requirements to own firearms as H.R. 45 would impose on all of us. Chicago's municipal laws didn't save Blair Holt's life and didn't prevent his killer from getting the handgun illegally. What makes legislators think legislation like this will work at the national level?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •