superdemon
Regular Member
imported post
Citizen wrote:
Well, seeing as how I choose not to interpret KY law, or attempt to put some sort of political spin on established legal principle, your suggested edit will not be used at this time.
You can still (and always have been) freely travel in the Commonwealth. If you want to do it on state owned roads, however, you will do so in the manner prescribed by the Commonwealth. You are welcome to walk, saunter, sashay, amble, or otherwise travel freely.
And your cirvular logic about the state not being able to grant a privilige that didn't already exist as a right insofar as the state derives it's power from the people...
I'm pretty sure that at the time KY became a Commonwealth, vehicles and automobile travel were not even thought of as a possibility. KY law, in reflecting the will of the people who legislate those laws, decided that driving was inded, aprivilige, and it would be administered as such.
If you don't believe the "current legal construct", I suppose you believe the legal construct of the original founders of the Constitution, who granted to the people the right to own slaves, keep women from voting, etc. Yes, lets not let the "current legal construct" reflect the actual modern world.
Citizen wrote:
superdemon wrote:Suggested edit:It does not violate your rights, as you do not have a right to drive in KY. In KY, driving isa privilige granted by the state.
Did you know you don't own your operator's license in the Commonwealth? That is what gives me the right to take it from you.
Additionally, it does save other people's lives, we will go into it if you want.
Kentucky some time ago violated the right of the people to freely travel by instituting a licensing scheme and then, in order to justify said scheme, claimed driving was a privilege granted by the state. (Nevermind that the state can't grant a privilege that didn't already exist as a right insofar as the state derives its power from the people.) The real question is, "Who is dumb enough to accept or believe literally the current legal construct?"
Well, seeing as how I choose not to interpret KY law, or attempt to put some sort of political spin on established legal principle, your suggested edit will not be used at this time.
You can still (and always have been) freely travel in the Commonwealth. If you want to do it on state owned roads, however, you will do so in the manner prescribed by the Commonwealth. You are welcome to walk, saunter, sashay, amble, or otherwise travel freely.
And your cirvular logic about the state not being able to grant a privilige that didn't already exist as a right insofar as the state derives it's power from the people...
I'm pretty sure that at the time KY became a Commonwealth, vehicles and automobile travel were not even thought of as a possibility. KY law, in reflecting the will of the people who legislate those laws, decided that driving was inded, aprivilige, and it would be administered as such.
If you don't believe the "current legal construct", I suppose you believe the legal construct of the original founders of the Constitution, who granted to the people the right to own slaves, keep women from voting, etc. Yes, lets not let the "current legal construct" reflect the actual modern world.