Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Missouri State Police call us "Terrorists"

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    , California, USA
    Posts
    106

    Post imported post

    Am I the only one just a little bit concerned by this?



    http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c200..._20090317.html

  2. #2
    Regular Member Sonora Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    3,958

    Post imported post

    'Looks like the source of this stuff was the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    HOMELAND INSECURITY
    State drops warnings over 'militia' members
    'Had that report been reviewed by my office it would never have been released'




    Posted: March 27, 2009
    9:17 am Eastern



    By Bob Unruh
    ©2009WorldNetDaily


    The chief of the Missouri highway patrol is blasting a report issued by the Missouri Information Analysis Center that linked conservative groups to domestic terrorism, assuring that such reports no longer will be issued.

    The report warned law enforcement agencies to watch for suspicious individuals who may have bumper stickers for third-party political candidates such as Ron Paul, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin.

    It further warned law enforcement to watch out for individuals with "radical" ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing illegal immigration, abortion and federal taxes.

    Chief James Keathley of the Missouri State Patrol issued a statement that the release of the report, which outraged conservatives nationwide, prompted him to "take a hard look" at the procedures through which the report was released by the MIAC.

    "My review of the procedures used by the MIAC in the three years since its inception indicates that the mechanism in place for oversight of reports needs improvement," he wrote. "Until two weeks ago, the process for release of reports from the MIAC to law enforcement officers around the state required no review by leaders of the Missouri State Highway Patrol or the Department of Public Safety."

    He said the militia report was "created by a MIAC employee, reviewed by the MIAC director, and sent immediately to law enforcement agencies across Missouri. The militia report was never reviewed by me or by the Director of Public Safety, John Britt, at any point prior to its issuance. Had that report been reviewed by either my office or by leaders of the Department of Public Safety, it would never have been released to law enforcement agencies," wrote Keathley

    The report simply "does not meet" the needed standard for "intelligence," he said.

    "For that reason, I have ordered the MIAC to permanently cease distribution of the militia report. Further, I am creating a new process for oversight of reports drafted by the MIAC that will require leaders of the Missouri State Highway Patrol and the Department of Public Safety to review the content of these reports before they are shared with law enforcement. My office will also undertake a review of the origin of the report by MIAC," he ordered.

    The warning earlier prompted Americans for Legal Immigration to issue a "national advisory" against relying on any such reports.

    The Missouri document, it said, "attempted to politicize police and cast suspicion on millions of Americans. The 'Missouri Documents,' as they came to be called, listed over 32 characteristics police should watch for as signs or links to domestic terrorists, which could threaten police officers, court officials, and infrastructure targets.

    "Police were instructed to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, The Federal Reserve


    , and the North American Union/SPP/North American Community. The 'Missouri Documents' also said potential domestic terrorists might like gun shows, short wave radios, combat movies, movies with white male heroes, Tom Clancey Novels, and Presidential Candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin!" ALIPAC wrote.



    It said the report cited the Southern Poverty Law Center as a resource.

    "When many of us read these Missouri Documents we felt that the false connections, pseudo research, and political attacks found in these documents could have been penned by the SPLC and ADL," said William Gheen of ALIPAC. "We were shocked to see credible law enforcement agencies disseminating the same kind of over the top political propaganda distributed by these groups."










    GA_googleFillSlot("WND_NWS_C0200");






    var rnd = Math.round(Math.random()*10000000);
    document.write('');





    GA_googleFillSlot("WND_NWS_C0201");











  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    I heard MO state congressional leaders on the radio yesterday about this. They are pretty darn mad. The new democrat governor just keeps blaming the prior republican governor (he obviously has access to Obama's teleprompters). But this appears to have been the work of a small group of people who are being read the riot act and getting reamed pretty good at this point now that it has blown up all over the state.

    ETA: by the way, this is a repost but I am too lazy to look up the original thread on it at the moment.
    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Who wrote this report ?

    Who approved this report ?

    Will there be a follow up ?



  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spokane Valley, Washington, USA
    Posts
    69

    Post imported post

    It said the report cited the Southern Poverty Law Center as a resource.
    That tells you all you need to know about the reports credibility.

    The SPLC is a leftist organization that wishes to abolish the us constitution andour rule of law with it.

    They promote illegal immigration and support the criminal agenda of thefederally funded racist organizationTHE RACE (LA RAZA).

    They label those who defend our nation from illegal foreign invasionas 'nativists'.

    They label all who disagree with their Socialist Doctrine as 'terrorists', as their contribution to this report clearly illustrates.

    The fact that theMissouri officials didn't know, or didn't care, to research this is a stain upon their records.

    ~

    You should always make sure your vetting process is in place before you go ahead with your plans.....








  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    , California, USA
    Posts
    106

    Post imported post

    It was rescinded...not that that means anything though. See my blog here:

    http://drpaleophd.blogspot.com/

    I also posted a link to acopy of the report if anyone is interested.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,510

    Post imported post

    Forgive the link to an Alex Jones video, but he does find some good stuff if you ignore his blather and hyperbole:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz9dZPJKhEo

    Looking at the books in her car (including a Tom Clancy novel), much of which is in my library and those of many gun rights advocates, they remark, "Man, she's into this weird... crap."


  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    9,193

    Post imported post

    The thing itself

    http://88.80.13.160.nyud.net/leak/miac-militia-2009.pdf

    http://infowars.com/media/rightwing-dhs.pdf

    http://images.logicsix.com/DHS_RWE.pdf

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...cals-on-right/ Federal agency warns of radicals on right, 14 April 2009

    The first sentence of the first 'key finding'...

    — (U//LES) Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups
    during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry
    out violent acts.


    "Violent antigovernment groups ... have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts."

    So, deemed violent based on previous actions? Certainly not on contemporary actions or contemplated future actions? It is not the weight of evidence but only the seriousness of the charge. We are doomed.

    Prepare to be assimilated by the BOG. Resistance to Obongo's Obamination is futile. BOG Brother is watching - OBEY!

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Gloucester, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    629

    Post imported post

    Atleast the ADL and SPLC are finally getting the recognition they deserve as extremist anti-american groups that they are. The ADL was caught several years ago using their police contacts in California to spy on Americans they deemed a threat to Israel! Their offices were raided and thousands of classified police documents were recovered, that had detailed confidential information about American citizens that the ADL thought fit to alert the Israeli intelligence services about.

    The SPLC has been sending out monthly reports to law enforcement agencies for years. They claim to be a "civil rights" organization, and target White "racist" groups and any body that disagrees with the pro Israel lobby in this country, including Muslim Americans, but as stated in a previous postsupport anti-American racist groups such as La Raza, and other extremist anti-American groups.

    Their ability to "advise" our nations LEO's is equivilent to having the KKK send out reports to LEO's about who to look out for. Insanity!

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    , California, USA
    Posts
    106

    Post imported post

    Well...

    Anyone heard about the Department of Homeland Security issuing a almost identical report apparently?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •