• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Arkansas open carry bill fails on committee voice vote

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

http://www.todaysthv.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=82610&catid=2

Ark. Panel Rejects Open-Carry Bill

A House committee has rejected a measure that would have allowed people 21 and older to openly carry handguns in holsters.

The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday rejected the proposal by Rep. Mark Martin of Prairie Grove. Martin argued that dozens of states permit the open carry of weapons, and that lawmakers should trust gun owners to use and display the firearms responsibly.

But members questioned why Martin's bill didn't include a required license or coursework, like the state's concealed-carry license does.

The bill failed on a voice vote.

--

More coverage:





Ark. panel rejects open-carry bill - FOX16.com
[size=-1]A House committee has rejected a measure that would have allowed people 21 and older to openly carry handguns in holsters.
FOX16 Local News - [url]http://www.fox16.com/news/local/[/url] [/size]

Under the Dome: Open carry bill fails in House Judiciary
[size=-1]By Steve Harrelson
Mark Martin's bill to allow for the open carry of firearms and other weapons failed on a voice vote this morning in House Judiciary. Prior to the vote, the bill was amended to provide for a minimum age of 21. ...
Under the Dome - [url]http://www.underthedome.com/[/url] [/size]

Bill to allow open carrying of firearms fails in committee ...
[size=-1]By Zack Stovall
Martin said after the vote he planned to request an interim study on his proposal. Arkansas has some of the most prohibitive gun laws in the nation, he said. “Forty-four states have some form of open carry. Only six do not,” he said. ...
Arkansas News - [url]http://arkansasnews.com/[/url] [/size]
 

Gray Peterson

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
2,236
Location
Lynnwood, Washington, USA
imported post

Ok, then if the issue with this committee is that they want it to be folded into the currently licensing statute, then let's do it?

Open carry for the most part is currently banned in Arkansas. Why not fold it into the PTC system and be done with it now.
 

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
imported post

Unfortunate, but not unexpected. I thank Rep. Martin for sticking to principles and not giving in to the licensing requirement.
 

AZkopper

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
675
Location
Prescott, Arizona, USA
imported post

In most cases, especially with 'revolutionary' ideas (like actually following the Constitution), incrementalism is the way to go. The anti's learned that long ago. Perhaps its time we played the same game. As long as the end game is the same (unlicensed open carry), it is good to go. At least AK would have had some form of open carry to start with. 'Sticking to your guns' got them nowhere.
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
imported post

Does Arkansas have a Constitution that allow people to keep and bear arms. If all the people that signed the petition donated a $100 for a law suit, perhaps that would be the way to go. But again I'm not up onyour state laws.
 

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
imported post

Venator wrote:
Does Arkansas have a Constitution that allow people to keep and bear arms.
It's quite weak, unfortunately. The Arkansas constitution doesn't guarantee an individual RKBA for self defense.

Article 2. Declaration of Rights.

§ 5. Right to bear arms.

The citizens of this State shall have the right to keep and bear arms, for their common defense.
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
imported post

KBCraig wrote:
Venator wrote:
Does Arkansas have a Constitution that allow people to keep and bear arms.
It's quite weak, unfortunately. The Arkansas constitution doesn't guarantee an individual RKBA for self defense.

Article 2. Declaration of Rights.

§ 5. Right to bear arms.

The citizens of this State shall have the right to keep and bear arms, for their common defense.


It's stronger than the USA 2nd. It seems clear that individuals have a right to bear arms for their defense. Screw the common defense whatever way you want to spin that term.
 

Swampbeast

Regular Member
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
81
Location
Boone, NC, ,
imported post

Its a real shame that it did not go to a full vote of the legislature so everyone could see where their reps and senators stood on the bill. Hopefully the fight will continue!
 

downntheholler

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
2
Location
Sherwood, ,
imported post

I think Arky has a open carry on shotguns and rifles...and as for hand guns the law is ...as long as you are on a journey...from what I understand the Journey Law is your Defense when Open Carry is in question.

I was also told that the State Game and Fish set gun laws for the state of Arkansas, and that is why you can be charged if you open carry including rifles or shotguns as well as handguns when there is not a Legal season on game/fur bearing animals and you are in and area considered wildlife cover...which was off of the blacktop basically.



Was sent and email a few years back on this from the Ark. State Police...when I questioned the open carry laws here as I had come from Arizona.
 

GOV5

Regular Member
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
10
Location
, ,
imported post

AZkopper wrote:
In most cases, especially with 'revolutionary' ideas (like actually following the Constitution), incrementalism is the way to go. The anti's learned that long ago. Perhaps its time we played the same game. As long as the end game is the same (unlicensed open carry), it is good to go. At least AK would have had some form of open carry to start with. 'Sticking to your guns' got them nowhere.
I agree with you 100%! I see no reason that some form of initial classwork on education for those OCers would present a problem. I mean, police need to get training. They just aren't trained in traffic stops, investigation, handling crowds, etc....... and then just handed a gun and told "Have a big time with it!". LOL!!

Any type of carry should have some education to go along with it...basically from a legal standpoint. What is, and isn't, legal in the state in which you will be carrying. I learned a lot in my class for the S.C. CWP, and I'm glad I had to take it to get a license. What if I had to dig up all that stuff myself? Where would I have started? Or would I have been one of the unfortunate ones that found out the laws when I was standing in front of the Judge? Not the way I want to learn. LOL!!

OH, I know I'm from SC, but I hope you didn't mind me butting in on a discussion of what is YOUR State's choice. Hope I didn't offend anybody. Just trying to offer up another way of viewing the subject.
 

Arkyhog

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
75
Location
Fort Smith, Arkansas, USA
imported post

GOV5 wrote:
Any type of carry should have some education to go along with it...

The key word there is "should". I say the key word shouldn't be "must"!

The Second Amendment does not say if you are trained, then your right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. In fact, I don't see anywhere in the Constitution where a person must be trained to exercise his God-given rights.

If you settle for Open Carry with a permit, you are settling for the legislature to always bein able to have control over your rights. If that is the only way Arkansas will pass open carry, so be it; however, it will be over my strong protests! Arkansas legislators should not be able to outlaw any law-abiding citizen from exercising his right to bare arms.
 

Notso

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
432
Location
Laveen, Arizona, USA
imported post

I'd suggest finding a few anti-gun legislators that are vulnerable in an election, get with the NRA(they do have some value in this regard)and get them booted out. Go at them hard and make an example of them and see if you can get others to change their opinion.
 
M

McX

Guest
imported post

damn. well don't give up, go again. i may visit your state, have in the past. good thing my penn. non-res. will at least allow me to enjoy your state comfortably, if i get there again. oc would have been a sweet option.
and on that note; i'd rather ask those assembled, than ccdotwhatever. so what's the rules there? no bars, schools, public buildings? what about parks? any comments welcome.

and a rant to think about: what the hell is the public's problem with oc? they get owly, and nothing happens. like in your state; the legislature guys says; no blah, blah, and no training. c'mon man. alot of the world knows us around starbucks, damn near every apprentice oc-er ends up here. as i did, as you did, to get trained. so odds are the ocer you see is equal to or better on laws than you. anything to be scared of?
 

AbNo

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,805
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
imported post

Notso wrote:
I'd suggest finding a few anti-gun legislators that are vulnerable in an election, get with the NRA(they do have some value in this regard)and get them booted out. Go at them hard and make an example of them and see if you can get others to change their opinion.
I'd suggest starting the ACDL, myself. :)
 

Attaboy

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
9
Location
Little Rock
Given that the present HB1051 presently in commitee is virtually the same as the bill proposed by Rep. Mike Martin a year ago, I'm now wondering if open carry bills are being proposed with wording intentionally omitting any requirements which would assuage commitee members' concerns and allow an open carry bill to pass into the house for a vote. Is this a pre-emptive "blocking" tactic to indefinitely put off legalizing open carry in Arkansas? Hmmmmm...:confused:
 

icebox13

New member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
2
Location
AR
Given that the present HB1051 presently in commitee is virtually the same as the bill proposed by Rep. Mike Martin a year ago, I'm now wondering if open carry bills are being proposed with wording intentionally omitting any requirements which would assuage commitee members' concerns and allow an open carry bill to pass into the house for a vote. Is this a pre-emptive "blocking" tactic to indefinitely put off legalizing open carry in Arkansas? Hmmmmm...:confused:

Considering HB1051 failed today and that the hearing was basically a sham, it makes me wonder this myself.
 

aadvark

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
1,597
Location
, ,
Arkansas Code 5-73-120(a) States: ...[w]ith The Intent to Employ it Against Another [Person].

NO Intent, NO Crime!
 

hermannr

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,327
Location
Okanogan Highland
Venator wrote:
It's quite weak, unfortunately. The Arkansas constitution doesn't guarantee an individual RKBA for self defense.

Article 2. Declaration of Rights.

§ 5. Right to bear arms.

The citizens of this State shall have the right to keep and bear arms, for their common defense.

I don't think that is such a weak statement...maybe not up to Washington state's Article 1 section 24, but better than some other states that allow OC.

"common defense" does not necessarily preclude your carry for your own personal defense as well as the defense of others. It definately does not have to stupid "milita" statement in it, so that argument is out the window.
 

hermannr

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,327
Location
Okanogan Highland
Given that the present HB1051 presently in commitee is virtually the same as the bill proposed by Rep. Mike Martin a year ago, I'm now wondering if open carry bills are being proposed with wording intentionally omitting any requirements which would assuage commitee members' concerns and allow an open carry bill to pass into the house for a vote. Is this a pre-emptive "blocking" tactic to indefinitely put off legalizing open carry in Arkansas? Hmmmmm...:confused:

How about putting the best construction on Mr. Martin and his desire for a constitutional option,

Remember, the 2A says "shall not be infrnged". The courts have also stated that 'if you license a "right", it is no longer a "right" but a privilage". I am 100% for Mr Matin and his desire...I think he is 100% correct.

I live in WA, we have unlicensed OC and always have had. Our state constitution specifically states that a person can "bear arms" for his/her own personal self defense, as well as that of the state. It has been held up in our courts, If you wish to license CC, you have to allow OC without a license. The state of Idaho courts say the same, as does Oregon and their state constitutional statements are not as cut and dried as WA is. In fact, ID's constitutional statement is almost identical to OK and IL's wording...go figure.

Your state consititutionall statement is not that much different than WA's. IMHO: If you took it to court you would have your unlicensed OC without any problems.
 
Last edited:
Top