• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Scientists find active "super thermite" in WTC dust

spy1

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
242
Location
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
imported post

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html

A team of nine scientists have unearthed startling data from dust gathered in the days and weeks after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on 9/11. They discovered that scattered throughout the dust samples were red and gray chips of 'active thermitic material', or an un-reacted pyrotechnic explosive.

Thermite is used in steel welding, fireworks shows, and hand grenades. It is the combination of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produce a reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. The 'active thermitic material' discovered in the World Trade Center dust was a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide, and is a form of thermite known as 'nano-structured super-thermite'.

“These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere; available papers describe this material as an intimate mixture of UFG[Ultra-fine grain] aluminum and iron oxide in nano-thermite composites to form pyrotechnics or explosives. Commercially available thermite behaves as an incendiary when ignited, but when the ingredients are ultra-fine grain and are intimately mixed, this 'nano-thermite' reacts very rapidly, even explosively, and is sometimes referred to as 'super-thermite',” the report explains.

The full article in The Open Chemical Physics Journal can be found here: http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Some of the authors of the paper have lost their jobs at universities and chemistry labs for their outspoken breakdown of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Kevin Ryan lost his job as a lab director after writing a letter to the National Institute for Standards and Technology(NIST was conducting an investigation into 9/11 at the time) challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers. Ryan claims that the owner of his laboratory subsidiary "was the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings,” according to the South Bend Tribune. Dr. Steven E. Jones, a physicist at Brigham Young University, presented a paper in 2005 discussing alternative theories to the commonly accepted 'jet fuel' reasoning. In September 2006 he was placed on paid administrative leave and his paper was removed from the BYU database.

Jones has told Visibility911.com, "In short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings."

Parts of the report mention other studies being conducted by the scientists that will come out soon.
 

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
imported post

So, nine scientists take 7-1/2 years to find iron oxide and aluminum particles where aluminum airplanes slammed into iron-framed buildings?

Brilliant minds, those.
 

PT111

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Messages
2,243
Location
, South Carolina, USA
imported post

KBCraig wrote:
So, nine scientists take 7-1/2 years to find iron oxide and aluminum particles where aluminum airplanes slammed into iron-framed buildings?

Brilliant minds, those.
They could have found them much sooner but the tin foil hats blocked their lines of communication from each other.
 

6L6GC

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
492
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

PT111 wrote:
KBCraig wrote:
So, nine scientists take 7-1/2 years to find iron oxide and aluminum particles where aluminum airplanes slammed into iron-framed buildings?

Brilliant minds, those.
They could have found them much sooner but the tin foil hats blocked their lines of communication from each other.
yes, the tin foil hats was bad enough but the propellers on their pointy little heads kept blowing away the evidence laden dust!!

What's even worse is a senseless post like this built on baseless conspiracy theories that are beyond absurd and have nothing whatsoever to do with open (or even concealed) carry of guns. The moderators should just completely delete this foolish mind rot. Allowing such nonsense to stay on this site will eventually render it into just another superfluous nut-job web site.
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

KBCraig wrote:
So, nine scientists take 7-1/2 years to find iron oxide and aluminum particles where aluminum airplanes slammed into iron-framed buildings?

Brilliant minds, those.



Actually, 7 1/2 years later, I'm still waiting to hear the explanationfor building 7. Maybe these things take time? I figured if I give it another eternity or so....
 

les_aker

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
221
Location
Springfield, Virginia, USA
imported post

PT111 wrote:
They could have found them much sooner but the tin foil hats blocked their lines of communication from each other.

Anyone that's still wondering why the building collapsed at this point is seriously deluded.
 
Top