Carpetbagger
Campaign Veteran
imported post
RedKnightt wrote:
Let's take this"rule" to its logical extension...
If an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibitsselling alcohol to Jews, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules.
If an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibitsselling alcohol to anyone wearing a t-shirt with an anti-American slogan, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules.
If an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibitsselling alcohol to anyone on welfare, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules.
Anyone think these would fly?
RedKnightt wrote:
"I've confirmed through our Chief Administrative Officer and Director of Real Estate that we do not have clauses or amendments to leases that would nullify the rules of private property owners. In other words, if an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibits open/concealed carrying of a legal firearm, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules."
Let's take this"rule" to its logical extension...
If an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibitsselling alcohol to Jews, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules.
If an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibitsselling alcohol to anyone wearing a t-shirt with an anti-American slogan, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules.
If an ABC store has a lease with a private property/shopping center owner that prohibitsselling alcohol to anyone on welfare, as a tenant we are subject to the private property owner's rules.
Anyone think these would fly?