TFred
Regular Member
imported post
Mark Steyn is filling in for Rush Limbaugh today. Just a bit ago, he was discussing the fact that most European nations are unable to muster any significant self defense effort, and as a consequence are not really a sovereign nation. Instead they are "defense welfare" states, depending on other countries (yes, that would be the United States) to defend them in case of an attack.
It struck me that this analogy also applies to the anti-gun "citizens" as well. They are clearly unable to muster any significant self-defense, and must rely on a hope and a prayer (or call to 911, etc.) for their own self-defense.
Defense Welfare: the next logical step to a total socialist welfare state.
TFred
Mark Steyn is filling in for Rush Limbaugh today. Just a bit ago, he was discussing the fact that most European nations are unable to muster any significant self defense effort, and as a consequence are not really a sovereign nation. Instead they are "defense welfare" states, depending on other countries (yes, that would be the United States) to defend them in case of an attack.
It struck me that this analogy also applies to the anti-gun "citizens" as well. They are clearly unable to muster any significant self-defense, and must rely on a hope and a prayer (or call to 911, etc.) for their own self-defense.
Defense Welfare: the next logical step to a total socialist welfare state.
TFred