• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

keep hitting this poll on gun control!

DoubleR

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
689
Location
Fairfax County, VA, ,
imported post

Got it, Mike.

As of 11:25 EDT...
Too weak - 1485 (20%)
Well-balanced - 544 (7%)
Too restrictive - 4326 (58%)
Make little difference one way or other - 1082 (15%)
 

JediWithASniper

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
22
Location
Tulsa, OK
imported post

Voted C - Too restrictive.

Gun Control doesn't work, ask your average person everywhere, they will say that the criminals will get the guns anyway. Just a bad idea in it's entirety I think.
 

jerg_064

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
126
Location
Warner Robins, Georgia, USA
imported post

A. Too weak - 1562 (17%)

B. Well-balanced - 609 (7%)

C. Too restrictive - 5544 (62%)

D. Make little difference one way or other - 1270 (14%)

8,985 Respondents


Done son.
 

UTOC-45-44

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
2,579
Location
Morgan, Utah, USA
imported post

Voted too restrictive

A.
Too weak - 1563 (17%)
responses.unshift([1,1563]);


B.
Well-balanced - 610 (7%)
responses.unshift([2,610]);


C.
Too restrictive - 5557 (62%)
responses.unshift([3,5557]);


D.
Make little difference one way or other - 1272 (14%)
responses.unshift([4,1272]);


chart_pie.png
9,002 Respondents





TJ
 

Kevin Jensen

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,313
Location
Santaquin, Utah, USA
imported post

INFRINGED!!! :cuss:


A.
Too weak - 1563 (17%)
responses.unshift([1,1563]);


B.
Well-balanced - 614 (7%)
responses.unshift([2,614]);


C.
Too restrictive - 5592 (62%)
responses.unshift([3,5592]);


D.
Make little difference one way or other - 1274 (14%)

responses.unshift([4,1274]);


chart_pie.png
9,043 Respondents
 

PatriotWarrior

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
17
Location
Cleveland, Tennessee, USA
imported post

A. Too weak - 1594 (16%)


B. Well-balanced - 634 (6%)


C. Too restrictive - 6327 (64%)


D. Make little difference one way or other - 1367 (14%)



9,922 Respondents

Keep up the good work.
 

Tumbleweeds

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
26
Location
, ,
imported post

PatriotWarrior wrote:
A. Too weak - 1594 (16%)


B. Well-balanced - 634 (6%)


C. Too restrictive - 6327 (64%)


D. Make little difference one way or other - 1367 (14%)



9,922 Respondents

Keep up the good work.
I put my vote in.
 

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

A. Too weak - 1604 (16%)


B. Well-balanced - 652 (6%)


C. Too restrictive - 6644 (64%)


D. Make little difference one way or other - 1408 (14%)

10,308 Respondents


Is it just me or could this be a clear indication that the wrong folks are running the country?
 

nepawolf

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
53
Location
Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

A. Too weak - 1604 (16%)
B. Well-balanced - 652 (6%)
C. Too restrictive - 6674 (65%)
D. Make little difference one way or other - 1412 (14%)
10,342 Respondents
 

GetA2J

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
32
Location
Terre Haute, Indiana, USA
imported post

A.
Too weak - 1610 (15%)
responses.unshift([1,1610]);


B.
Well-balanced - 667 (6%)
responses.unshift([2,667]);


C.
Too restrictive - 6761 (65%)
responses.unshift([3,6761]);


D.
Make little difference one way or other - 1428 (14%)
 

spy1

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
242
Location
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Mike - Is it true that the site doing the poll can - when someone clicks on that live link here - tell that the vote was cast from a pro-gun site?

Would it be better if we pasted those things as "dead" links (that one would have to copy and paste into their browser-of-choice) instead of "live" links? Pete
 

nepawolf

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
53
Location
Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

spy1 wrote:
Mike - Is it true that the site doing the poll can - when someone clicks on that live link here - tell that the vote was cast from a pro-gun site?

Would it be better if we pasted those things as "dead" links (that one would have to copy and paste into their browser-of-choice) instead of "live" links? Pete
There would be more of the issue of them looking for specific cookies to see what sites you visit, including this one.
 
Top