-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Fire mission - NEW "Time" Poll - HIT IT!
- Thread starter spy1
- Start date
thx997303
Regular Member
imported post
Wow, we need to hit this one hardcore.
We're only winning 51% to 49%
Wow, we need to hit this one hardcore.
We're only winning 51% to 49%
Felid`Maximus
Activist Member
imported post
Funny how it asks if it should be a "top priority."
How about asking whether it should be on the agenda at all?
I don't want it to be a top priority or a secondary priority.
Funny how it asks if it should be a "top priority."
How about asking whether it should be on the agenda at all?
I don't want it to be a top priority or a secondary priority.
Thundar
Regular Member
imported post
No is winning 57-43%
No is winning 57-43%
SlackwareRobert
Regular Member
imported post
57% anti BHO vs 43% illiterate sheep
But shouldn't we have a "C", Why they are already banned since the 30's option.
Followed by "D" Should he start with banning crooked LEO agencies who
refuse to aknowledge the constitution.
Would like to see the stats vs the number of subscribers to thier rag.
57% anti BHO vs 43% illiterate sheep
But shouldn't we have a "C", Why they are already banned since the 30's option.
Followed by "D" Should he start with banning crooked LEO agencies who
refuse to aknowledge the constitution.
Would like to see the stats vs the number of subscribers to thier rag.
SpringerXDacp
New member
imported post
Yes 67% No33%
Yes 67% No33%
Michigander
Regular Member
imported post
Looks like it's down already. :uhoh:
Looks like it's down already. :uhoh:
Citizen
Founder's Club Member
imported post
Michigander wrote:
Hmmmmm. Maybe they didn't like the direction it was heading.
Michigander wrote:
Hmmmmm. Maybe they didn't like the direction it was heading.
spy1
Regular Member
imported post
http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/archive/poll_results_327.html
"No" 61%
"Yes" 39%
Mission accomplished - thank you everyone! Pete
http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/archive/poll_results_327.html
"No" 61%
"Yes" 39%
Mission accomplished - thank you everyone! Pete
Task Force 16
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Did you notice the number of respondants in each state?
The top3 responding states were:
California - 483 votes
New York - 467 votes
Texas - 457 votes
Montana and Delaware, where the yeas won,only had 10 and 15 voters, respectively.
Did you notice the number of respondants in each state?
The top3 responding states were:
California - 483 votes
New York - 467 votes
Texas - 457 votes
Montana and Delaware, where the yeas won,only had 10 and 15 voters, respectively.