• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Milwaukee Police Chief's & Sheriff's statements indicate questionable states of mind

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

joshdr wrote:
Mike wrote:
joshdr wrote:
I live in Milwaukee, a few blocks from the Menards where Jesus was arrested and close to where Krause was arrested. I plan on carrying my G17 as soon as I figure out what a decent holster is for it. Looks like I'll be getting tackled shortly.
Well, make sure you have some witnesses and video coverage, and perhaps forget to carry ID that day (sterile carry) and remain silent when and if seized :)

From the news reports, outside of Milwaukee,I don't think there will be much problem OCing but you all gotta stay clear of those pesky 1,000 ft. school zones and keep the guns unloaded and in trunks when in vehicles - you all have many more obstacles than most states but the momentum is in the right direction.

If you wanno host an OCmeet up somewhere, be it a park or backyard BBQ, feel free to post here.
I live within 1000 feet of a school, so no open carrying off my property. Also I have a pickup truck, so I'm not sure if its legal to keep the gun in the bed of my truck. I'm also curious about SUV's and station wagons, can I just keep it in the back?
You raise great points - i do not know the answer on this - anyone with case law on the WI school zone and car carry ban as applied to these facts?
 

Rick Finsta

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
232
Location
Saukville, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

The school zone law does not apply on private property, but unless you know if the sidewalks in your neighborhood are publicly or privately owned, I would be careful. I also live in a school zone, but I own my sidewalk, as do my neighbors, making a stroll down the sidewalk legal for me.

As far as I can tell THERE IS NO CASELAW ON WHETHER OR NOT THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC USE OF LAND ON A PRIVATELY-OWNED SIDEWALK MAKES IT LEGALLY "PUBLIC PROPERTY," however. So, exercise caution.
 

bnhcomputing

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
1,709
Location
Wisconsin, USA
imported post

IANAL, these are just the facts as I find them.


Carry within 1000 ft of a school zone on PRIVATE property is legal. That's 1000 ft from the school property, not the school. Carry inside the 1000 ft zone is legal, but must be unloaded and encased. Now State Statute says "unless you have a permit." Several of us here have tried to get such a permit, it would appear that no such permit can/is issued. (Sounds a lot like Heller, but then I thinking out loud)

As for auto, statute dictates "unloaded and encased when in/on a vehicle." Some LEO will tell you NOT in the passenger compartment, but there is NO STATUTE I can find stating that (otherwise, carrying [unloaded and cased] on motor cycle and ATV would be illegal).
 

joshdr

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
8
Location
, ,
imported post

I was wondering about the motorcycle issue as well, In the summer a motorcycle is my main mode of transportation. Perhaps a motorcycle doesnt have a passenger compartment, so could I open carry on the bike? Only other option is to have it encased in my backpack.
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
imported post

Mike wrote:
Wow - it sure won't be hard to beat Milwaukee's claim of qualified immunity when open carriers are illegaly detained and searched sue in federal court - these public statements by the Milwaukee Police Chief and Sheriff that they are requiring officers to violate the Fourth Amendment and seize all open carriers and their gun make such claims almost impossible to sustain.

And how dumb - any prohibited persons or criminals caught in such unlawful "takedowns" would go scott free as all evidence would be suppressed.

Is the Milwaukee City Attorney and Council listening to these irresponsble men wearing badges?

---

http://wcco.com/wisconsinwire/22.0.html?type=local&state=WI&category=n&filename=WI--CarryingWeapons.xml

Milwaukee chief to officers: Ignore gun memo

MADISON, Wis. (AP) Milwaukee's police chief said Tuesday he'll go on telling his officers to take down anyone with a firearm despite Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen's finding that people can carry guns openly if they do it peacefully.

Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn said he'll continue to tell officers they can't assume people are carrying guns legally in a city that has seen nearly 200 homicides in the past two years.

''My message to my troops is if you see anybody carrying a gun on the streets of Milwaukee, we'll put them on the ground, take the gun away and then decide whether you have a right to carry it,'' Flynn said. ''Maybe I'll end up with a protest of cowboys. In the meantime, I've got serious offenders with access to handguns. It's irresponsible to send a message to them that if they just carry it openly no one can bother them.''

State Justice Department spokesman Kevin St. John declined to comment.

Wisconsin is one of 29 states that allow people to openly carry a firearm without a permit. It's one of two states that ban concealed weapons.

Flynn's comments came as gun control advocates and state lawmakers derided Van Hollen's ruling.

''The idea of people ... openly carrying guns strikes me as somewhere between bonkers and totally ridiculous and stupid,'' said state Rep. Josh Zepnick, D-Milwaukee.

Van Hollen, a Republican, issued a memo Monday explaining how disorderly conduct overlaps with the constitutional right to bear arms. Van Hollen concluded citizens have a constitutional right to openly carry firearms, and disorderly conduct charges depend on the circumstances.

OpenCarry.org, a gun advocacy Web site, issued a statement saying the finding was ''spot on.'' The Wisconsin Sheriffs and Deputy Sheriffs Association said the memo clearly finds people can bear arms in an orderly manner.

But Oregon, Wis., Police Chief Doug Pettit said the memo doesn't provide much direction for police, who already know open carry is legal in Wisconsin and disorderly conduct is a case-by-case judgment call.

''I don't know if the memo clarifies anything, other than it's not an automatic disorderly conduct charge,'' Pettit said. ''Clearly, I think law enforcement, like anything else, will have to use their discretion.''

Dane County District Attorney Brian Blanchard said open carry cases have rarely come up, but he'd want to know why someone has chosen to carry a gun before making a charging decision.

''Police will be quick to ask you, 'Why do you have a gun with you? Is somebody stalking you?' Those are going to be fair inquiries,'' he said. ''We'd be particularly concerned if someone was openly possessing a gun in the context of an ongoing dispute or feud.''

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke said the memo just muddies things. Police still aren't clear on what might constitute disorderly conduct, he said.

''How we approach a person with a gun, I can tell you right now, isn't going to change. As far as a law enforcement person is concerned, you just don't walk up to a person with a gun and say 'excuse me, sir,''' Clarke said. ''On the ground, give up. Get that gun under control and then we'll figure out what we got here.''

Gov. Jim Doyle, a former attorney general, believes local communities should be allowed to create their own gun ordinances, spokesman Lee Sensenbrenner said. A 1995 law bars municipalities from enacting stiffer ordinances than state statutes, but carrying a rifle during hunting season is different from walking around Milwaukee with a gun on your hip, Sensenbrenner said.

Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said Van Hollen's memo underscores the nation's weak gun laws. The Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort, a statewide organization dedicated to ending gun violence, estimates guns kill about 450 people in the state each year.

''A lot of people who get guns and carry guns don't always understand the responsibility and risk that goes with gun ownership,'' Helmke said. ''People get drunk, people get angry, people make mistakes. More guns generally mean more violence.''

State Rep. Leon Young, D-Milwaukee, a former police officer, said he was shocked by Van Hollen's memo. He said he planned to look into drafting legislation to ban open carry.

''It's just a bad idea. We've just had too many incidents of gun violence,'' Young said.

Flynn, Milwaukee's police chief, said the opinion was clearly drafted in the safety of the Justice Department's offices, not on Milwaukee's streets.

''From an officer's safety point of view and a public point of view,'' he said, ''we're not going to start with the assumption that someone displaying a handgun is doing it lawfully.''

All I can say is the OCers in Wisconsin better start getting organized if the Milwaukee police Chief is disregarding the law and you have some AH ex LEO in the house of Reps, trying to get OC outlawed.

Strength in numbers. MORE FEDERAL LAW SUITS if this harassment continues. Man I can't believe it. We have some problems in Michigan, but nothing like our neighbor to the west. Perhaps all that water between us has something to do with it.
 

pvtschultz

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
299
Location
West Allis, WI, ,
imported post

We have a constitutional right to OC. A new state statute cannot take that away due to Article 1, Section 25. If we had CC, then they might be able to take away OC since we will still have the right to self defense. The WI Supreme Court (even when it was still liberal) told the legislature to pass some sort of CC statute as the result of Art. 1 Sect 25. They've failed to and as a result are subject to court precident. Unfortunately, someone has to hang their ass on the line first and risk losing it all. We've got a conservative WIsupreme courtnow, butthe tree of liberty needs to be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots from time to time. I've served my country once, I'm not sure if I'm ready to go the full distance quite yet.
 
Top