Rayce Bannon
Regular Member
imported post
Believe the 'spokeshole' for the California State Sheriffs' Association just said,
"AB 357 not only removes the good cause requirement but it also requires, rather than authorizes, a sheriff to issue the applicant a concealed weapon permit if the applicant meets other requirements. The removal of law enforcement discretion sets a dangerous precedent, particularly in regards to firearm possession."
Not sure who said 'cops are caught in the middle' butthat is a complete falsehood. 'Peace Officers' (as a whole) do not have any desire forCitizens to excercise their fundamental Rights. They do not want an armed Citizenry How many times must 'they' broadcast to u, that they simply do not care about u the Citizen Master?
The Cal Const, recognizes the U.S. cont is the sup law of the land. Where doesit say in u must beg the guvt for a piece of paper to have ur guaranteed and protect Right? If they cannot adhere to their oath to support, affirm, protect the constitution(s)...then simply resign.
here's another fine recent example of a 'peace officer' w/ an apparent Napoleon complex.(LOL) http://www.kvia.com/Global/story.asp?S=10216950
Believe the 'spokeshole' for the California State Sheriffs' Association just said,
"AB 357 not only removes the good cause requirement but it also requires, rather than authorizes, a sheriff to issue the applicant a concealed weapon permit if the applicant meets other requirements. The removal of law enforcement discretion sets a dangerous precedent, particularly in regards to firearm possession."
Not sure who said 'cops are caught in the middle' butthat is a complete falsehood. 'Peace Officers' (as a whole) do not have any desire forCitizens to excercise their fundamental Rights. They do not want an armed Citizenry How many times must 'they' broadcast to u, that they simply do not care about u the Citizen Master?
The Cal Const, recognizes the U.S. cont is the sup law of the land. Where doesit say in u must beg the guvt for a piece of paper to have ur guaranteed and protect Right? If they cannot adhere to their oath to support, affirm, protect the constitution(s)...then simply resign.
here's another fine recent example of a 'peace officer' w/ an apparent Napoleon complex.(LOL) http://www.kvia.com/Global/story.asp?S=10216950