• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009

inetprez

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
45
Location
Lake Elsinore, California, USA
imported post

Basically this "little" piece of legislation would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:

- You are licensed (5 year license)
- It is registered
- You are fingerprinted
- You supply a current Driver's License
- You supply your Social Security #
- You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing
- Each update - change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25


Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.
 

Legba

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
1,881
Location
, ,
imported post

This has officially been referred to committee, where it ought to die a painful death by mockery.

-ljp
 

Teej

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
522
Location
, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

Very few people with a functioning brain cell are worried about this.

It was last congressional session and back then he had like 9 cosponsors for it or something. It never made it out of committee. The guy introducing it (forgot his name) is a raving loony illinois (chicago?) hack.

Now he has zero cosponsors this time around.

It's an ugly bill, but it's pretty much too ridiculous to have a chance of passing, even in this congress. And therein is shown the disconnect - a lot of non-gunners think it sounds like perfectly reasonable "common sense".
 

wrightme

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
5,574
Location
Fallon, Nevada, USA
imported post

It has also been "threaded" into submission here since the day it was introduced in early January. A search is likely to turn up a baker's dozen or two on this one topic.
 

Legba

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
1,881
Location
, ,
imported post

The ambiguity hadn't occurred to me, but take what you will from it. ;-/

-ljp
 
Top