• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

2 REVIEWS of a DIRECT 2A ATTACK

W

wrightme

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
5,574
Location
Fallon, Nevada, USA
imported post

That examiner guy, though clearly against a ban, does not have his facts all correct.
Many Americans incorrectly believe that civilians are able to own fully automatic weapons (machine guns) where once the trigger is pulled, rounds are expelled at a fast rate. An AR-15, for example, is the semi automatic civilian version of the U.S. military's M16 rifle. The M16 has a three round burst option but the AR15 can only shoot one round at a time.
Click to expand...
He incorrectly believes that civilians are not able to own fully automatic weapons.


READ THE COMMENTS OF THE 2nd ONE
Click to expand...
To that I can only say one thing: "Sheeple of the world, UNITE!" :p
 
Huck

Huck

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
646
Location
Evanston, Wyoming, USA
imported post

wrightme wrote:


READ THE COMMENTS OF THE 2nd ONE
Click to expand...
To that I can only say one thing: "Sheeple of the world, UNITE!" :p
Click to expand...
They dont have a clue as to what they're talking about and the sad part is that they dont want to know. They want to believe the drivil that they spew and no one and nothingwill ever convince them to change their minds. "Sheeple" is a understatement!
 
T

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

It's amazing how the folks that support an AWB never think about how AW "STYLE" weapons in the hands of citizesn is all that stands between a free society and an oppressive government that would trash our Constitutional Rights.
 
N

N00blet45

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
475
Location
Walton County, Georgia, ,
imported post

Task Force 16 wrote:
It's amazing how the folks that support an AWB never think about how AW "STYLE" weapons in the hands of citizesn is all that stands between a free society and an oppressive government that would trash our Constitutional Rights.
Click to expand...
Bayonet lugs and pistol grips don't stand in the way of liberty and tyranny.

You'd think that an assault weapons ban would ban assault weapons. Too bad it just bans scary looking features more than actual functionality. What else could you expect from people who make laws based on emotion?
 
A

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

N00blet45 wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
It's amazing how the folks that support an AWB never think about how AW "STYLE" weapons in the hands of citizesn is all that stands between a free society and an oppressive government that would trash our Constitutional Rights.
Click to expand...
Bayonet lugs and pistol grips don't stand in the way of liberty and tyranny.

You'd think that an assault weapons ban would ban assault weapons. Too bad it just bans scary looking features more than actual functionality. What else could you expect from people who make laws based on emotion?
Click to expand...



x infinity

Although... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO6pjHiVEVA
 
D

Dustin

Regular Member
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
1,723
Location
Lake Charles Area, Louisiana, USA
imported post

N00blet45 wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
It's amazing how the folks that support an AWB never think about how AW "STYLE" weapons in the hands of citizesn is all that stands between a free society and an oppressive government that would trash our Constitutional Rights.
Click to expand...
Bayonet lugs and pistol grips don't stand in the way of liberty and tyranny.

You'd think that an assault weapons ban would ban assault weapons. Too bad it just bans scary looking features more than actual functionality. What else could you expect from people who make laws based on emotion?
Click to expand...

Well Said ! :monkey
 
T

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

N00blet45 wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
It's amazing how the folks that support an AWB never think about how AW "STYLE" weapons in the hands of citizesn is all that stands between a free society and an oppressive government that would trash our Constitutional Rights.
Click to expand...
Bayonet lugs and pistol grips don't stand in the way of liberty and tyranny.

You'd think that an assault weapons ban would ban assault weapons. Too bad it just bans scary looking features more than actual functionality. What else could you expect from people who make laws based on emotion?
Click to expand...

IF we use the literal definitions of the words "assault weapons" separately, we could include baseball bats, hammers, clubs, pitch forks, and any other object that can be used to inflict injury.

Proponants of AWB are a perfect example of the "Blind leading the blind".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top