imported post
mark edward marchiafava wrote:
My "opinion" and the law are one and the same.
Screw the opinions of courts which conflict with the constitution.
Ok brother, you da man. Console yourself with that thought while you sit in a federal prison after ya work up the cojones to walk around a school while you OC. Stroll around till the cops show up.
Everyone will watch your case very closely you can be sure and admire you for your courage in standing up for your opinion. I'll throw in a $100.00 to your defense fund because I'd like to see you win.
I say we "know your opinion" because you take every oportunity to beat people over the head with article 1, sec.11 of the state constitution. For Christ's sake Mark, this is a gun forum, WE'VE ALL READ AND UNDERSTAND ARTICLE 1 SEC. 11 ALREADY!
Your line about "Screw the opinions of courts which conflict with the constitution." Is an opinion, not a law.
I know you spend time looking around the other forums here. Whenever someones makes a definitive statement about law, people want to see citations to prove facts not go by someones "word for it". Requests for cites are all over the forums and I don't think I'm being unreasonable to ask for a cite from you. You say its a constitutionally protected activity, I say show me the courts opinions on that. I want more than just a "because I say so". The courts feel the same way about your opinions as you feel about theirs. The difference being, theirs carry the weight of law and yours carry the weight of hot air. That's why I want to know what they think, not what you think.
I'm gonna be offline for a few days so Mark, you get the last word for awhile.
Very sorry I can't make the meetup, I would have enjoyed carrying on the debate with ya there.