Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: GUN CONTROL without GUN LAWS

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Remember the golden rule ...

    He who controls the gold makes the rules .

    http://www.slate.com/id/2217117

    The anti-gunners are making & sellinglemonade out of our lemonade stand .

    :X:X:XWhat can we do if Obama does this ?



  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Hey It's the XGov. Eliot Spitzer Scandal grabbing the guns .



  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
    Posts
    2,615

    Post imported post

    It's a dumb idea to start with. And I can't see liberals attempting it because it would be an admittance that "consumers" can force change in a free market economy, something that they have adimently denied for years.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,510

    Post imported post

    Spitzer is from a whole other planet.

    BTW, Slate's forum software sucks even worse than mywowbb. At least here, you can see more than one comment at a time.


  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Super Secret Squirrel Bunker, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    485

    Post imported post

    :X:X:XWhat can we do if Obama does this ?
    By then it's too late. Instead of waiting, we should be mobilizing now to "encourage" manufacturers, distributors & dealersto end sales of firearms to law enforcement if they are firearms prohibited to citizens.



  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    R a Z o R wrote:
    Hey It's the XGov. Eliot Spitzer Scandal grabbing the guns .



    In for more pictures of the hooker. For once you post a worthwhile accompanying picture.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sneads Ferry, ,
    Posts
    189

    Post imported post

    Apparently Spitzer needs to get out of public policy (something he obviously isnt good at) and back into hookers (-----) nuff said.

  8. #8
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Islamabad, Pakistan
    Posts
    621

    Post imported post

    buzzsaw wrote:
    Apparently Spitzer needs to get out of public policy (something he obviously isnt good at) and back into hookers (-----) nuff said.
    Spitzer does have good taste in hookers, not much else though.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    R a Z o R wrote:
    Hey It's the XGov. Eliot Spitzer Scandal grabbing the guns .



    In for more pictures of the hooker. For once you post a worthwhile accompanying picture.
    Cann't blame the X Gov. for wanting to feed his family but stop with the aggressive progressive liberal agenda and leave my RKBA out of it please .



  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Fallon, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    5,580

    Post imported post

    Mr. Y wrote:
    :X:X:XWhat can we do if Obama does this ?
    By then it's too late. Instead of waiting, we should be mobilizing now to "encourage" manufacturers, distributors & dealersto end sales of firearms to law enforcement if they are firearms prohibited to citizens.

    A good reason to buy a Barrett. Do they sell to CA Police departments yet?
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sneads Ferry, ,
    Posts
    189

    Post imported post

    They did until Barrett heard the Chief or Sherriff don't remember which speak at a hearing in San Fran. (I think) speak against private citizens being allowed to keep firearms. Turns out the dept. had one of his rifles in for service work. All the dept. has seen from Barrett since is a letter lammenting the back up in service work and an appology for the extended time necessary to get to their weapon. He did assure the Chief that they would get back to him attheir earliest opportunity. Still waiting.

  12. #12
    Regular Member Decoligny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rosamond, California, USA
    Posts
    1,865

    Post imported post

    "This prompts a simple question: Why do we buy guns from companies that permit their products to be sold to bad guys? "

    What a stupid question!

    "This prompts a simple question: Why do we buy cars from companies that permit their products to be sold to drunk drivers? "



  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Fallon, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    5,580

    Post imported post

    buzzsaw wrote:
    They did until Barrett heard the Chief or Sherriff don't remember which speak at a hearing in San Fran. (I think) speak against private citizens being allowed to keep firearms. Turns out the dept. had one of his rifles in for service work. All the dept. has seen from Barrett since is a letter lammenting the back up in service work and an appology for the extended time necessary to get to their weapon. He did assure the Chief that they would get back to him attheir earliest opportunity. Still waiting.
    Here is a letter that the owner of Barrett Rifles sent to Hawaii, when they contemplated a ban on .50 for citizens similar to CA.

    http://www.barrettrifles.com/news_articles.aspx?id=50

    From what I remember, Barrett Rifles does not sell rifles to LE that are not allowed to be sold to citizens.
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    wrightme wrote:
    buzzsaw wrote:
    They did until Barrett heard the Chief or Sherriff don't remember which speak at a hearing in San Fran. (I think) speak against private citizens being allowed to keep firearms. Turns out the dept. had one of his rifles in for service work. All the dept. has seen from Barrett since is a letter lammenting the back up in service work and an appology for the extended time necessary to get to their weapon. He did assure the Chief that they would get back to him attheir earliest opportunity. Still waiting.
    Here is a letter that the owner of Barrett Rifles sent to Hawaii, when they contemplated a ban on .50 for citizens similar to CA.

    http://www.barrettrifles.com/news_articles.aspx?id=50

    From what I remember, Barrett Rifles does not sell rifles to LE that are not allowed to be sold to citizens.

    It is our gold , our country , and our constitution when we are UNITED .


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •