-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Fairbanks gun rights group grows leery of federal government
- Thread starter Alaskan Shooter
- Start date
Alaskan Shooter
Regular Member
imported post
One thing the above story leaves out is that many of us that attended were OCing and had no problems as usual.
One thing the above story leaves out is that many of us that attended were OCing and had no problems as usual.
NewZealandAmerican
Regular Member
imported post
sv_libertarian
State Researcher
imported post
Not. Going. To. Respond. To. Stupid. Shit.
Ok, I lied. Aside from the fact that Alaska does not even have 2 million people in it, and the huge expense of shipping 1.4 million people to Alaska to bring the population up to 2 million, do you really think a camp that can hold 1/3 of the population of San Diego (or 6 times the population of Anchorage, or about three times the population of Seattle) would even be feasible? That is 1/100th of the population of the US you are suggesting can be interned around Fairbanks. I don't thing the infrastructure exists anywhere in the state of Alaska to move that many people around, let alone support a camp like that.
Not. Going. To. Respond. To. Stupid. Shit.
Ok, I lied. Aside from the fact that Alaska does not even have 2 million people in it, and the huge expense of shipping 1.4 million people to Alaska to bring the population up to 2 million, do you really think a camp that can hold 1/3 of the population of San Diego (or 6 times the population of Anchorage, or about three times the population of Seattle) would even be feasible? That is 1/100th of the population of the US you are suggesting can be interned around Fairbanks. I don't thing the infrastructure exists anywhere in the state of Alaska to move that many people around, let alone support a camp like that.
imported post
NZA:
Two million? I find that an implausible figure. It would be the equivalent of a major city. Imagine the personnel, infrastructure and logistics such an installation would require. Also, these would not be complacent guests, but very unhappy campers.
NZA:
Two million? I find that an implausible figure. It would be the equivalent of a major city. Imagine the personnel, infrastructure and logistics such an installation would require. Also, these would not be complacent guests, but very unhappy campers.
sv_libertarian
State Researcher
imported post
Ooops, I guess reality didn't mesh with NZA's carefully constructed paranoia. I don't know why people want to BELIEVE crap like "FEMA death camps" or the like... I swear ALL the crazy crap from 1999 is resurfacing again.
Ooops, I guess reality didn't mesh with NZA's carefully constructed paranoia. I don't know why people want to BELIEVE crap like "FEMA death camps" or the like... I swear ALL the crazy crap from 1999 is resurfacing again.