-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Van Hollen memo does not address real issue (According to the Journal Times)
- Thread starter Lex
- Start date
Max
Regular Member
imported post
We now know the letter seems no less stupid no matter how many times it is posted. :lol:
We now know the letter seems no less stupid no matter how many times it is posted. :lol:
Teej
Regular Member
imported post
If I'm not mistaken, that's an opinion from the paper's editors, not a letter they received.
I wouldn't use the Milw. Journal or the racine journal times to wrap dead fish in.
If I'm not mistaken, that's an opinion from the paper's editors, not a letter they received.
I wouldn't use the Milw. Journal or the racine journal times to wrap dead fish in.
smithman
Regular Member
imported post
Teej wrote:
Teej wrote:
That comment is fricking hilarious!
Teej
Regular Member
imported post
I was going to reference a more scatological purpose I also would not use it for but decided to keep it friendly.
I was going to reference a more scatological purpose I also would not use it for but decided to keep it friendly.