Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 53

Thread: Obama's paranoid socialists do not believe in an armed citizentry .

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5P2PyfQhiyg

    Oppressive paranoid socialist do not believe in an armed citizentry and are afraid of the very reason the SECOND AMENDMENTwas put in the Bill of Rights in the first place .

    Obama is now pushing the CIFTA .



  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,882

    Post imported post

    Real socialists believe in guns. Long live the IWW, and I hope everyone had a good May Day.

    -ljp

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    "Socialism" has become such a buzz word these days. :quirky

    I'm waiting for all these "socialism" hating, captialism nut swinging people to start demanding a tax increase for themselves so the rich don't have to float their asses. That is what they're aruging for, isn't it? The poor rich, they're taxed so much. Ok you whiny bitches, write Uncle Sam a check to make up the difference between your tax rate and the rich's oh-so-burdensome rate.

  4. #4
    Regular Member demnogis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orange County, California, USA
    Posts
    912

    Post imported post

    Off Topic but uncle sam doesn't deserve what he is taking from the people today (tax-wise).

    Less government = less taxes + more freedom.
    Gun control isn't about guns -- it is about control.

  5. #5
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator Gray Peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lynnwood, Washington, USA
    Posts
    2,238

    Post imported post

    Legba wrote:
    Real socialists believe in guns. Long live the IWW, and I hope everyone had a good May Day.

    -ljp
    Indeed, that's a piece of local history.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Gun owners should beware of the CIFTA Treaty , it is backdoor gun control on a global scale . The POTUS is wanting to please the utopian progressive dreamers that are idiots too of an international scale .

    http://www.alphecca.com/?p=1399

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    "Socialism" has become such a buzz word these days. :quirky

    Ok you whiny bitches
    How bout liberalaggressiveprogressivesocialist paranoid anti-gunners that are a danger to us well armed and polite utopians ?

    buzz !



  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    "Socialism" has become such a buzz word these days. :quirky

    Why be a paranoid socialist? We will pick up your awful guns that you want to get rid of todayand at no charge . Just dial 555 NOMOGUN.

    Why risk possible prison time andlawyer fees ? Dial 555 NOMOGUNnow and ask to speak to Safety :quirky.

    And remember our president and Hilliary will be proud you did .

  9. #9
    Regular Member SouthernBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Western Prince William County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    5,849

    Post imported post

    The only good socialist is the one that lies on the ground and doesn't breathe.

    In the final seconds of your life, just before your killer is about to dispatch you to that great eternal darkness, what would you rather have in your hand? A cell phone or a gun?

    Si vis pacem, para bellum.

    America First!

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    SouthernBoy wrote:
    The only good socialist is the one that lies on the ground and doesn't breathe.


    Scan me a copy of the check you're mailing the government or ****.

  11. #11
    Regular Member Alexcabbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Alexandria, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    2,290

    Post imported post

    SouthernBoy wrote:
    The only good socialist is the one that lies on the ground and doesn't breathe.
    Dennis Miller once said: "We need to change Election Day to April 15. Do you think these people would pull their crap if we hired them thw same day we paid them? But we ought't be too rough on socialists. Winston Churchill (whom Obama feigned to admire when quoting him about torture, and theres a lot to say about that) said that if a young man is not something of a socialist in his 20s he has no heart; but if he remains a socialist into his 30s he has no brain.

    Obama's bunch are not paranoid. An armed citizenry could very well throw a wrench into their plans to radically change and emasculate this country. At some point before the government sends trucks through neighborhoods to monitor electricity use and cut off folks who use "too much" (like charging up the green-mobile?) we the people are likely to have had it too far up, at least in isolated pockets.

    I was just this morning thinking about how the world as we know it could end in the next 24 hours. Let's say the Taliban assisted by their 5th column in the Pakistani armed forced makes an overnight thrust and takes Pakistan and with it their launch codes. "President" Obama is awakened and his response is to call the new Pakistani President Miullah Omar --- AND CONGRATULATE HIM and express his hopes that we can get along. India would have different sentiments, however. The Ubamanistas do not think we should EVER use nukes, and if we were nuked, a nuke response would to them serve only to "bringing us down to their level". Never mind that NO response would bring us about 6 feet BELOW their level. And that is their attitude in re the private use of firearms. How a grave equates to "high ground" (unless you are buried in New Orleans) I will leave up to you. We may not need to worry about private arms pretty soon. The "peace" the Ubamanistas advocate is the "peace" of surrender and the grave. No wonder they hate our firearms.


  12. #12
    Campaign Veteran marshaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia
    Posts
    11,487

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    Scan me a copy of the check you're mailing the government or ****.
    What are you talking about? I can complain about unjust taxes all I want, yet I needn't actually pay any for the privilege.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Centreville, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    581

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    SouthernBoy wrote:
    The only good socialist is the one that lies on the ground and doesn't breathe.
    ¬*

    Scan me a copy of the check you're mailing the government or ****.
    Holy **** AWD, get a ******* grip! It's not a question of who should pay more - the root problem is the amount Feds take to begin with. I can see some return from state and county taxes and I don't mind paying those, but judging by the return I can see from my federal taxes, the amount I pay should be like 50 bucks a year, not tens of thousands I'm paying now. The problem with filthy socialists is that they will create more inept wasteful programs which will require even more money in various taxes from all of us. All this programs do nothing for any normal upstanding working person -the only ones who benefit from them are worthless ghetto crackheads or some dirty illegals with 25 kids per family. If you don't see that, there is nothing else I can say...

  14. #14
    Campaign Veteran marshaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia
    Posts
    11,487

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez, like many other neo-liberals, believes that the inevitability of taxes necessarily justifies any and all taxes. Furthermore, although he accepts the unfairness of some taxes, the only solution he can possibly envision is raising taxes on the rich to make it "more fair". Hence his assumption that we, too, will inevitably cry for the same.

    Despite the fact that I have always advocated a reduction if not outright elimination of all taxes. I would be happy to pay for private roads if they would actually be paved to safe standards (liability ensures they would, unlike with government and its "sovereign immunity"). The only thing government really ought to provide is courts (possibly police and rescue). These could easily be paid for by minimal local commerce taxes, without taxing the exchange of labor for money or money for basic necessities.

    Obviously, AWDstylez hasn't been to California. If government is actually capable of using tax money to provide services in a justifiably efficient manner, then why is California hemorrhaging money? Why are our roads unpaved? Why are our schools being scaled back? Why are our prisons overfilled?

    Government is never the answer. Sorry AWDstylez. :P

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Centreville, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    581

    Post imported post

    marshaul wrote:
    AWDstylez, like many other neo-liberals, believes that the inevitability of taxes necessarily justifies any and all taxes. Furthermore, although he accepts the unfairness of some taxes, the only solution he can possibly envision is raising taxes on the rich to make it "more fair". Hence his assumption that we, too, will inevitably cry for the same.

    Despite the fact that I have always advocated a reduction if not outright elimination of all taxes. I would be happy to pay for private roads if they would actually be paved to safe standards (liability ensures they would, unlike with government and its "sovereign immunity"). The only thing government really ought to provide is courts (possibly police and rescue). These could easily be paid for by minimal local commerce taxes, without taxing the exchange of labor for money or money for basic necessities.

    Obviously, AWDstylez hasn't been to California. If government is actually capable of using tax money to provide services in a justifiably efficient manner, then why is California hemorrhaging money? Why are our roads unpaved? Why are our schools being scaled back? Why are our prisons overfilled?

    Government is never the answer. Sorry AWDstylez. :P
    +1000. You are so right! Too bad that more and more people indoctrinated by public schooling and media believe that government and it's deeds are unquestionable and government is there to help everyone and solve all problems...how naive...

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    Chaingun81 wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    SouthernBoy wrote:
    The only good socialist is the one that lies on the ground and doesn't breathe.
    Scan me a copy of the check you're mailing the government or ****.
    Holy @#$% AWD, get a @#$%ing grip! It's not a question of who should pay more - the root problem is the amount Feds take to begin with. I can see some return from state and county taxes and I don't mind paying those, but judging by the return I can see from my federal taxes, the amount I pay should be like 50 bucks a year, not tens of thousands I'm paying now. The problem with filthy socialists is that they will create more inept wasteful programs which will require even more money in various taxes from all of us. All this programs do nothing for any normal upstanding working person -the only ones who benefit from them are worthless ghetto crackheads or some dirty illegals with 25 kids per family. If you don't see that, there is nothing else I can say...


    And yet the fact that remains thatall the right wingerswhine and gripe about how the "socialist" politicians overtax the rich. You don't like how the rich are overtaxed? Offer to pay more yourself. You know damn well the government isn't getting any smaller anytime soon (if ever), so stop crying and just send more money so those terriblypersecuted rich people don't have to suffer. If you don't, you're nothing but a hypocrite and no better than the "worthless ghetto crackheads" because the rich are floating your ass too.

  17. #17
    Regular Member Statesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    949

    Post imported post

    Socialism works great, until you run out of money from the producer class. Then government has to force people to labor, doing jobs they don't want to do.

  18. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Centreville, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    581

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    Chaingun81 wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    SouthernBoy wrote:
    The only good socialist is the one that lies on the ground and doesn't breathe.
    Scan me a copy of the check you're mailing the government or ****.
    Holy @#$% AWD, get a @#$%ing grip! It's not a question of who should pay more - the root problem is the amount Feds take to begin with. I can see some return from state and county taxes and I don't mind paying those, but judging by the return I can see from my federal taxes, the amount I pay should be like 50 bucks a year, not tens of thousands I'm paying now. The problem with filthy socialists is that they will create more inept wasteful programs which will require even more money in various taxes from all of us. All this programs do nothing for any normal upstanding working person -the only ones who benefit from them are worthless ghetto crackheads or some dirty illegals with 25 kids per family. If you don't see that, there is nothing else I can say...


    And yet the fact that remains thatall the right wingerswhine and gripe about how the "socialist" politicians overtax the rich. You don't like how the rich are overtaxed? Offer to pay more yourself. You know damn well the government isn't getting any smaller anytime soon (if ever), so stop crying and just send more money so those terriblypersecuted rich people don't have to suffer. If you don't, you're nothing but a hypocrite and no better than the "worthless ghetto crackheads" because the rich are floating your ass too.
    You completely missed my point. Read before you post so you don't make yourself look stupid.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    Statesman wrote:
    Socialism works great, until you run out of money from the producer class. Then government has to force people to labor, doing jobs they don't want to do.
    You have the confused with capitalism. Unchecked capitalism moveswealth upward and eventually destroys itself because there's no money left in the middle/lower classes to create demand.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:

    You have the confused with capitalism. Unchecked capitalism moveswealth upward and eventually destroys itself because there's no money left in the middle/lower classes to create demand.
    The topic is Obama's unchecked paranoid socialist such as HaroldKoe .KOE is the Legal Advisor nominee that advocates GLOBAL GUN CONTROL.

    Harold Koe believes that international organizations should be enpowered to regulate our 2A right to own a gun .

    Until Gort is the world peace keeper let's play with a complete deck .



  21. #21
    Regular Member Alexcabbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Alexandria, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    2,290

    Post imported post

    Rather odd, isn't it, that the most openly socialist State in the Union, Vermont, has some of the most liberal carry laws in the world. Carry your weapon how you like, when you like, where you like. THAT is the kind of liberalism we need MORE of. The only kind.

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Alexcabbie wrote:
    Rather odd, isn't it, that the most openly socialist State in the Union, Vermont, has some of the most liberal carry laws in the world. Carry your weapon how you like, when you like, where you like. THAT is the kind of liberalism we need MORE of. The only kind.
    Almost like socialist NAZI snow zombies . lol

    How can one be prolife and antizombie ?

  23. #23
    Campaign Veteran marshaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia
    Posts
    11,487

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    Statesman wrote:
    Socialism works great, until you run out of money from the producer class.¬* Then government has to force people to labor, doing jobs they don't want to do.
    You have the confused with capitalism.¬* Unchecked capitalism moves¬*wealth upward and eventually destroys itself because there's no money left in the middle/lower classes to create demand.
    That may be "capitalism", but it is not a free market. Conversely, it may be a "free market", but it is not capitalism.

  24. #24
    Campaign Veteran marshaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia
    Posts
    11,487

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    You know damn well the government isn't getting any smaller anytime soon (if ever)
    Actually, I know nothing of the kind. Our government has grown way beyond any "economy of scale". In fact, it is top-heavy, bleeding money from top to bottom, and in some ways on the verge of outright implosion.

    If we won't shrink our government, it will collapse sooner rather than later. What size do you suppose it will be then?

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    marshaul wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    Statesman wrote:
    Socialism works great, until you run out of money from the producer class. Then government has to force people to labor, doing jobs they don't want to do.
    You have the confused with capitalism. Unchecked capitalism moveswealth upward and eventually destroys itself because there's no money left in the middle/lower classes to create demand.
    That may be "capitalism", but it is not a free market. Conversely, it may be a "free market", but it is not capitalism.

    You need to do a little more research into economics. Capitalism, a.k.a. a free market, moves wealth upward, end of story.


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •