They aren't obligated to protect. Not even the cops are. However, they could be civilly liable as they chose to be party to denying your right to carry.Here's what I wonder. If you get mugged in one of those zones, isn't the school now liable for that? If they deny your right to carry, aren't they obligated to protect?
Sounds good. I will compile an email list when I get the chanceTOTALLY.
Sounds like every open carrier in CA should be writing letters to every administrator of every school they regularly pass by and start building a folio of "denied" letters in the chance they are later attacked in these zones, a suit might have teeth.
I dream of the day 626.9 is overturned. A school ends at their property line, the commons begins at that demarcation, those commons should not be freedom suspension zones simply due to being adjacent to a school.
Here's an idea for a follow-up letter. If I have time to dig up contact info, I may do it myself.
Dear ______
Have you ever been mugged? If so, did you try your "message of non-violent dispute resolution"? If so, did it work?
WTF does this have to do with dealing with muggers or rapists or serial killers? This is so far out of touch with reality it is frakin scary. These people are clearly clueless idiots and there is no point in engaging them in any capacity. We just need to take our rights back via the courts.Further, your request appears inconsistent with the message of non-violent dispute resolution that the district encourages in its diverse student populations.
The school district may well attempt to encourage certain behavior in its student populations, but everyone in the district isn't a student!Further, your request appears inconsistent with the message of non-violent dispute resolution that the district encourages in its diverse student populations.
Wow, the responses (denials) are almost verbatim! Form letter response.