ixtow
Founder's Club Member
imported post
Task Force 16 wrote:
Besides, it wouldn't change anything. We wouldn't know who needed that until it was already done.
There are clear traitors in our government already. Is anyone getting their hands dirty?
Nope. We're all still too 'reasonable' to do something about it. I ask, what is 'reasonable' about knowingly allowing a traitor to weave his/her craft?
Task Force 16 wrote:
Everybody talks big, but the time for that kind of action came and went decades ago.ixtow wrote:That "surgical strike" may come back against them.They would behave VERY differently if they had the filibuster-proof senate. And we still don't know if they'll get it.
They aren't being timid because of the Gun Lobby. they know there will be a price to pay, and they're just waiting for a guarantee that they can launch their assault and the damage will be done before that price is paid.
When they finally "pull the trigger" on it, you can be certain that it will be done swiftly and without the buildup they usually have.
If and when they do take anti-gun action, it will come swiftly and without warning. The gears of Congress will have never turned faster. They don't want a fight, they want a guaranteed surgical strike.
Besides, it wouldn't change anything. We wouldn't know who needed that until it was already done.
There are clear traitors in our government already. Is anyone getting their hands dirty?
Nope. We're all still too 'reasonable' to do something about it. I ask, what is 'reasonable' about knowingly allowing a traitor to weave his/her craft?