• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Racine man will not be charged

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
imported post

Bicyclist pointing gun not charged
By Associated Press


Posted: May. 15, 2009

Racine - A Racine bicyclist who pulled out his revolver to scare off a group of teens during an apparent robbery attempt won't be charged.

The man, 42, told police he was riding his bicycle May 1 when four teens knocked him off and seemed to be trying to rob him, so he pulled out the revolver he was carrying in a side holster, pointed it up and yelled, "Gun."

The teens fled, and he flagged down a police officer.

The man, who asked not to be identified, was treated at the scene for a wrist injury. Police escorted him home and returned his gun to him.

Racine County District Attorney Mike Nieskes sent him a letter Friday, saying he wouldn't be charged, even though he was violating a law by carrying a gun within 1,000 feet of a school.

"I have decided it would not be in the greater interest of justice in the community to charge you with violation of Wisconsin Statute regarding gun free zones," Nieskes wrote.

Nieskes noted that the man has no criminal record, and there was no showing of irresponsible use of the firearm.

He also cited a recent memo issued by Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen that people have a constitutional right to openly carry firearms, as long as they aren't violating restrictions set in other laws. But Van Hollen also said police have the right to check anyone openly carrying a gun.
 

J.Gleason

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
3,481
Location
Chilton, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

Maybe everyone should fire this D.A. off an email thanking him for his professional and respectable decision. It is nice to see he is not some over zealous prosecutor.
 

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
imported post

I was talking to some people about this. They suspect a deeper reason why he declined to prosecute. If this issue went to court, it would bring into the lights of the press regarding the issue of carry within 1000 feet of a school. They surmised that rather than risk the ire of the people/press it would be best to just drop the issue.



Showing that criminal activity can occur with in this protected 1000 feet might make people think this rule is as foolish as it is in reality.


I agree
 

tomm1963

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
176
Location
mke, ,
imported post

bigdaddy1 wrote:
I was talking to some people about this. They suspect a deeper reason why he declined to prosecute. If this issue went to court, it would bring into the lights of the press regarding the issue of carry within 1000 feet of a school. They surmised that rather than risk the ire of the people/press it would be best to just drop the issue.

Showing that criminal activity can occur with in this protected 1000 feet might make people think this rule is as foolish as it is in reality.


I agree

It could also have worked its way up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for a ruling on the constitutionality of the school zone law. Possibly putting an end to this silly law while circumventing our dysfunctional legislature..
 
Top