The "correct" answer should be neither, since if she calls for help, someone with a gun may respond and "murder" the wouldbe killer. Instead, she should do nothing but whisper soothing "empowering" and "life affirming" words to her murderer which bolster his self-esteem as a murderer.
That's right. The US government is waaaaay worse.
AWDstylez wrote:
You're right... the US Government does way worse things to its own citizens.:quirky
Using that logic.... if an employee of a company goes nuts and guns down his coworkers, it is the Company's fault because it was paying him and he used that money to buy guns?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:AWDstylez wrote:
You're right... the US Government does way worse things to its own citizens.:quirky
When did I say anything about its own citizens? I wonder if that AK he's holding was US funded. :lol::quirky
AWDstylez wrote:Using that logic.... if an employee of a company goes nuts and guns down his coworkers, it is the Company's fault because it was paying him and he used that money to buy guns?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:AWDstylez wrote:
You're right... the US Government does way worse things to its own citizens.:quirky
When did I say anything about its own citizens? I wonder if that AK he's holding was US funded. :lol::quirky
Oh, I got one better... because a person gets killed by a bullet... it is the fault of the bullet manufacturer? How about the gun maker? How about a man who purchases a gun for self defense at his own home... but 10 years later, he loses his job and kills his whole family... is it the Company's fault for firing him? Or for paying him in the first place?
Your arguments are weak and full of holes...
Says the guy that just spliced an entire paragraph together with ellipses. :quirky
Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:AWDstylez wrote:Using that logic.... if an employee of a company goes nuts and guns down his coworkers, it is the Company's fault because it was paying him and he used that money to buy guns?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:AWDstylez wrote:
You're right... the US Government does way worse things to its own citizens.:quirky
When did I say anything about its own citizens? I wonder if that AK he's holding was US funded. :lol::quirky
Oh, I got one better... because a person gets killed by a bullet... it is the fault of the bullet manufacturer? How about the gun maker? How about a man who purchases a gun for self defense at his own home... but 10 years later, he loses his job and kills his whole family... is it the Company's fault for firing him? Or for paying him in the first place?
Your arguments are weak and full of holes...
Um... yea... Blaming the tobacco company for giving you lung cancer is definitely exactly the same thing as saying the country that supports terrorists and terrorism,when convenient to do so (and invades other sovereign nations on allegations of doing the same, when convenient to do so), is as bad or worse than the insignificant terrorist foot soldiers. :quirky
AWDstylez wrote:Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:AWDstylez wrote:Using that logic.... if an employee of a company goes nuts and guns down his coworkers, it is the Company's fault because it was paying him and he used that money to buy guns?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:AWDstylez wrote:
You're right... the US Government does way worse things to its own citizens.:quirky
When did I say anything about its own citizens? I wonder if that AK he's holding was US funded. :lol::quirky
Oh, I got one better... because a person gets killed by a bullet... it is the fault of the bullet manufacturer? How about the gun maker? How about a man who purchases a gun for self defense at his own home... but 10 years later, he loses his job and kills his whole family... is it the Company's fault for firing him? Or for paying him in the first place?
Your arguments are weak and full of holes...
Um... yea... Blaming the tobacco company for giving you lung cancer is definitely exactly the same thing as saying the country that supports terrorists and terrorism,when convenient to do so (and invades other sovereign nations on allegations of doing the same, when convenient to do so), is as bad or worse than the insignificant terrorist foot soldiers. :quirky
Maybe stylez, you could have gotten further by explaining that the CIA provided many of the weapons that the Taliban are currently using, to the mujahideen when they were fighting against our great rival at the time, the Soviet Union.
Keep in mind here that the Soviets were carpet bombing villages that supported the mujahideen, while the mujahideen were torturing prisoners to death.
When Jimmy Carter ordered the aid to the mujahideen,they believed that he would be weakening the Soviet Union.
"We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would... The dat that the Soviets oficially crossed the border, I wrote to president Carter, "We now have the opportunity of giving the Soviet Union it's Vietnam War."
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter's national security advisor in an interview in Le Nouvel Observateur, January 15-21 1998
The Afghan-Soviet War has been credited as one of the major reasons for the Soviet Collapse.
I am assuming this puts your comment into context, stylez?