C'mon, it's San Angelo, so he's probably in the Air Force and speaking the truth: he's not qualified.27 years in the military and he doesn't feel qualified?
*cough* well every person on the forum was hoping their bill wouldn't pass either way.at least it will be very difficult for any idiot to try to blame the 'open carry goon squad' for their bill not getting passed.
More than likely. Perry has said he's calling a special session, but hasn't announced the subject. Probably just to deal with funding state agencies.After all that......Now it'll be 2 years won't it?
Don't be so naive. I hope that you don't truly feel that way. I think most people on this forum DID want their bill to pass because it's a step in the right direction. Any positive gun legislation is good legislation. We will not stoop to the SCCC's level and try to undermine other pro-gun bills.DKSuddeth wrote:*cough* well every person on the forum was hoping their bill wouldn't pass either way.at least it will be very difficult for any idiot to try to blame the 'open carry goon squad' for their bill not getting passed.
They should've worked more on helping the open carry bill instead of their campus carry bill. The only wanted to push for the college carry bill since the kids, will only be in college for a limited time. Oh well.
Let's hope to the next legislative session open carry will come around.
Hmm, I don't think I understood this:So, despite no actual attempt to pass open carry, the "insiders" didn't get anywhere with campus carry or parking lot protection.
Strangely, campus carry's failure really had more to do with Voter ID: it was one of the last bills to come out of committee, and the Democrats opposed to the voter ID bill loaded up the calendar committee so that campus carry never made it to a vote.
There are some administrative changes to the CHL law. They're good changes, but nothing to crow about.
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_Forum/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=25293