Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: SOTOMAYOR's HOSTILITY TOWARDS RKBA

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    From the standpoint of liberty and limited government , we that support the Second Amendment have significant reasons to be wary of Obama's SCOTUS nominee ...... SONIA SOTOMAYOR .

    Sonia Sotomayor's record of judicial philosophy concerning affirmative action as in the Ricci vs Destefano case and her liberal views on the RKBA suggest an unhealthy vision of the United States Constitutional Law .

    We must not support this nomination to the SCOTUS.The 2008 elections will have many consequences .



  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    Really, now, enough of this ****. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?

  3. #3
    Regular Member Washintonian_For_Liberty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mercer Island, Washington, USA
    Posts
    922

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    Let me guess, you think that she's a fine nominee.
    Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. ~ George Washington

  4. #4
    Regular Member buster81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,461

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    I only count 5.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    ^Gee... only five? Better keep going until we make it ten, just to be safe. :quirky



    Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    Let me guess, you think that she's a fine nominee.
    Hmm, why don't you go check one of the other 50 threads we have onthe topic? I've commented in all of them. :quirky

  6. #6
    Regular Member buster81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,461

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    ^Gee... only five? Better keep going until we make it ten, just to be safe. :quirky



    Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    Let me guess, you think that she's a fine nominee.
    Hmm, why don't you go check one of the other 50 threads we have onthe topic? I've commented in all of them. :quirky
    You have to admit, 5 is a long way from18 trillion. Since you've already stated your opinion, why not just move on?


  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    Let me guess, you think that she's a fine nominee.
    UPDATE: Second Amendment supporters speak out .

    http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/05...y5044428.shtml

  8. #8
    Regular Member buster81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,461

    Post imported post

    R a Z o R wrote:
    Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    Let me guess, you think that she's a fine nominee.
    UPDATE: Second Amendment supporters speak out .

    http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/05...y5044428.shtml
    O boy. Someone is going to get mad at you for posting more "@#$%".

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    buster81 wrote:
    R a Z o R wrote:
    Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
    O boy. Someone is going to get mad at you for posting more "@#$%".

    Take the poll ....

    ... Did you take the Poll ?




  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Centennial, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,412

    Post imported post

    Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    Really, now, enough of this @#$%. We have 18 trillion Sotomayor threads already and they're all filled with the same garbage. Why make another one?
    Let me guess, you think that she's a fine nominee.
    I don't think she is, but I am with AWD on this one. It's getting to be borderline spam. Do we really need an entirely new thread for every single new article?

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Sotomayor would not qualify as a juror.

    Should President Obama be using an empathy criterion that operates to select justices for the Supreme Court whose mode of decision making would render them ineligible for jury duty ?

    http://corner.nationalreview.com/pos...GQ2MjcxMzBmMDY=

    Defense only never won a thing .

    Unite , defend , and attack attack attack .

    Our voice and vote is like Benjamin Franklin's American Rattlesnake !

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Millions of Americans that are brand new gun owners and believe in the Right to Keep and Bear Arms feel that Obama's SCOTUS nominee proves their concerns .

    Americans beleive Obama's claim that he supports gun rights is nothing but ... .... ... ... ... ... ... lip service .

    Judge Sotomajor's record promises hostility not empathy towards the Bill of Rights' Second Amendment .

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Under your bed, ,
    Posts
    10

    Post imported post


  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
    She is a short , little trollish looking thing isn't she? I bet that she'd be the kind of girl who pulls the football back at the last second; no?

    Chuck
    WOW that's deep Chuck ; yes .

    My gun rights is the football and Charlie Brown is always the sucker .





  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    Abortionist , pro choice ,groups , are unhappy with Obama's Sotomayor choice .:what:

    Fractioning of the anti-Second Amendment sheeple is always good news .

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Under your bed, ,
    Posts
    10

    Post imported post

    [code]

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    R a Z o R wrote:
    Abortionist , pro choice ,groups , are unhappy with Obama's Sotomayor choice .:what:

    Fractioning of the anti-Second Amendment sheeple is always good news .


    Since when are pro-choice people automatically anti's?

  18. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Under your bed, ,
    Posts
    10

    Post imported post


  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    , Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,715

    Post imported post

    W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    R a Z o R wrote:
    Abortionist , pro choice ,groups , are unhappy with Obama's Sotomayor choice .:what:

    Fractioning of the anti-Second Amendment sheeple is always good news .


    Since when are pro-choice people automatically anti's?
    When they're Dem-U-Rats

    Chuck

    Since when are all Democrats anti's?


  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    AWDstylez wrote:
    R a Z o R wrote:
    Abortionist , pro choice ,groups , are unhappy with Obama's Sotomayor choice .:what:

    Fractioning of the anti-Second Amendment sheeple is always good news .


    Since when are pro-choice people automatically anti's?
    I meant semi-automatically anti-Second Amendment abortionist. I think it is just so awful that the late term abortionist are not supporting this Catholic nominee that is pro-life . Most 8 year olds know that youshouldnot be pro-death or pro-zombie .

    Let's gently divide and conquer with the skill of a surgeon all groups that are misinformed about the Bill of Rights .

  21. #21
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Under your bed, ,
    Posts
    10

    Post imported post


  22. #22
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Centennial, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,412

    Post imported post

    W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
    When they're breathing!

    Chuck
    Now there's one hell of a narrow view.

    R a Z o R wrote:
    Most 8 year olds know that youshouldnot be pro-death or pro-zombie .
    I still haven't figured out how pro-choice = pro-death. By that argument, because you are willing to kill another man to save your own life, you are pro-death.

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
    Code:
    WOW that's deep Chuck

    Your the one who posted Jaba's pic; I just commented on it.

    Chuck
    Definitely anti-gunners ... What is the right hand doing ?

    BRING ME WOOKIE AND LEIA .



  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    FogRider wrote:

    R a Z o R wrote:
    Most 8 year olds know that youshouldnot be pro-death or pro-zombie .
    I still haven't figured out how pro-choice = pro-death. By that argument, because you are willing to kill another man to save your own life, you are pro-death.


    I choice to be proactive in selecting the words I use . Most Americans support the Right to Keep and Bear Arms . Most Americans support a child to not be killed during birth and call themselves pro life . Some that support the death of the child at anytimeduring the pregnancy I call the opposite of pro life which is pro death . Obama and Michelle both supportanti gun and 9th month late term abortions at the time of birth . [ GOOGLE Michelle Obama late term 9th month elective abortion]

    If saying Brady Bunch gun control and pro choice is easier to say than saying social progressive anti Second Amendmentleft wing wackos and pro death of a child during pregnancy and at the time of birth for any reason of course that is one's right .

    Do you understand how it is to the advantage of those that open carry and wish to continue doing so uniting against a divided foe of anti Second Amendment types? Of course every grouping has a Molly's wart . Your avatar has several .

    Being politically correct means using the King's English correctly.

    [ Putting perfume on cat poop is like saying cracking a hole in the skull of a child then sucking out her brains electively is pro choice and not pro death . ]

    As gun owners we need to protect the Second Amendment from those that wish to destroy it . By pointing out a division among those that usually oppose our RKBA can only help to secure ourselves .





  25. #25
    Regular Member Alexcabbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Alexandria, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    2,290

    Post imported post

    W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
    AWDstylez wrote:
    R a Z o R wrote:
    Abortionist , pro choice ,groups , are unhappy with Obama's Sotomayor choice .:what:

    Fractioning of the anti-Second Amendment sheeple is always good news .


    Since when are pro-choice people automatically anti's?
    When they're Dem-U-Rats

    Chuck
    Chuck, a bit of clarification first it's DemonRatz and second not every Democrat s a DemonRat. Second yeah there are a lot of threads opened on this subject but new ones have to be after the old ones get invaded and derailed by TROLLS AND MOLES who say the same old thing in every thread on every subject, quote Wikipedia as a source and when directed to other more reliable Internet sites for info sneer at the poster for getting stuff off the inter net and, when cornered change the subject.

    The moles on here are trying desperately to blunt the groundswell attack on the nomination of this ghastly abomination to the Supreme Court. That is the meaning of the attempt to derail the thread, so that it looks like a bunch of BS and arguing instead of a united front.

    Ah crap it's 1:35 AM and another brouhaha at the corner bar and cops all over the place. Hard to concentrate. Anyway Sotomayor wouldn't make an acceptable JUROR let alone a Judge, and let's not even mention Supreme Court justice. But we aren't gonna stoop her on this blog. Write or Email the Republicans on the Committee ant tell them to keep the nomination bottled up. If not one Repub votes to send the nomination to the floor it dies. And do this for the next 500 people Obama brings on until and unless he realizes he has to ppoint someone acceptable. And f&^k the Mole/Troll. Obama is a gun-grabbing god damned Communist and he must be opposed at every turn. I certainly hope that after we get a Republican check on him next year that we will be able to have him impeached since his appointees derailed prosecution of voter intimidation by the Black Panthers, making Obama IMO an accessory after the fact in the felony of voter intimidation.


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •