• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

SOTOMAYOR's HOSTILITY TOWARDS RKBA

FogRider

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
1,412
Location
Centennial, Colorado, USA
imported post

W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
When they're breathing!

Chuck
Now there's one hell of a narrow view.

R a Z o R wrote:
Most 8 year olds know that youshouldnot be pro-death or pro-zombie .
I still haven't figured out how pro-choice = pro-death. By that argument, because you are willing to kill another man to save your own life, you are pro-death.
 

R a Z o R

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
861
Location
Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
imported post

FogRider wrote:


R a Z o R wrote:
Most 8 year olds know that youshouldnot be pro-death or pro-zombie .
I still haven't figured out how pro-choice = pro-death. By that argument, because you are willing to kill another man to save your own life, you are pro-death.



I choice to be proactive in selecting the words I use . Most Americans support the Right to Keep and Bear Arms . Most Americans support a child to not be killed during birth and call themselves pro life . Some that support the death of the child at anytimeduring the pregnancy I call the opposite of pro life which is pro death . Obama and Michelle both supportanti gun and 9th month late term abortions at the time of birth . [ GOOGLE Michelle Obama late term 9th month elective abortion]

If saying Brady Bunch gun control and pro choice is easier to say than saying social progressive anti Second Amendmentleft wing wackos and pro death of a child during pregnancy and at the time of birth for any reason of course that is one's right .

Do you understand how it is to the advantage of those that open carry and wish to continue doing so uniting against a divided foe of anti Second Amendment types? Of course every grouping has a Molly's wart . Your avatar has several .

Being politically correct means using the King's English correctly.

[ Putting perfume on cat poop is like saying cracking a hole in the skull of a child then sucking out her brains electively is pro choice and not pro death . ]

As gun owners we need to protect the Second Amendment from those that wish to destroy it . By pointing out a division among those that usually oppose our RKBA can only help to secure ourselves .
 

Alexcabbie

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
2,288
Location
Alexandria, Virginia, United States
imported post

W.T.F._Chuck? wrote:
AWDstylez wrote:
R a Z o R wrote:
Abortionist , pro choice ,groups , are unhappy with Obama's Sotomayor choice .:what:

Fractioning of the anti-Second Amendment sheeple is always good news .



Since when are pro-choice people automatically anti's?

When they're Dem-U-Rats:uhoh:

Chuck
Chuck, a bit of clarification first it's DemonRatz and second not every Democrat s a DemonRat. Second yeah there are a lot of threads opened on this subject but new ones have to be after the old ones get invaded and derailed by TROLLS AND MOLES who say the same old thing in every thread on every subject, quote Wikipedia as a source and when directed to other more reliable Internet sites for info sneer at the poster for getting stuff off the inter net and, when cornered change the subject.

The moles on here are trying desperately to blunt the groundswell attack on the nomination of this ghastly abomination to the Supreme Court. That is the meaning of the attempt to derail the thread, so that it looks like a bunch of BS and arguing instead of a united front.

Ah crap it's 1:35 AM and another brouhaha at the corner bar and cops all over the place. Hard to concentrate. Anyway Sotomayor wouldn't make an acceptable JUROR let alone a Judge, and let's not even mention Supreme Court justice. But we aren't gonna stoop her on this blog. Write or Email the Republicans on the Committee ant tell them to keep the nomination bottled up. If not one Repub votes to send the nomination to the floor it dies. And do this for the next 500 people Obama brings on until and unless he realizes he has to ppoint someone acceptable. And f&^k the Mole/Troll. Obama is a gun-grabbing god damned Communist and he must be opposed at every turn. I certainly hope that after we get a Republican check on him next year that we will be able to have him impeached since his appointees derailed prosecution of voter intimidation by the Black Panthers, making Obama IMO an accessory after the fact in the felony of voter intimidation.
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

R a Z o R wrote:
FogRider wrote:


R a Z o R wrote:
Most 8 year olds know that youshouldnot be pro-death or pro-zombie .
I still haven't figured out how pro-choice = pro-death. By that argument, because you are willing to kill another man to save your own life, you are pro-death.


If saying Brady Bunch gun control and pro choice is easier to say than saying social progressive anti Second Amendmentleft wing wackos and pro death of a child during pregnancy and at the time of birth for any reason of course that is one's right .


Call it what is it: pro-abortion and anti-abortion

"Pro-choice" and "pro-life" are hot-button propaganda names given by the respective groups to push their agendas. In reality, everyone is pro-life and everyone is pro-choice. But the issue isn't life or choice, it's abortion; so call it what it is.
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

Alexcabbie wrote:
Chuck, a bit of clarification first it's DemonRatz and second not every Democrat s a DemonRat. Second yeah there are a lot of threads opened on this subject but new ones have to be after the old ones get invaded and derailed by TROLLS AND MOLES who say the same old thing in every thread on every subject, quote Wikipedia as a source and when directed to other more reliable Internet sites for info sneer at the poster for getting stuff off the inter net and, when cornered change the subject.

The moles on here are trying desperately to blunt the groundswell attack on the nomination of this ghastly abomination to the Supreme Court. That is the meaning of the attempt to derail the thread, so that it looks like a bunch of BS and arguing instead of a united front.

Ah crap it's 1:35 AM and another brouhaha at the corner bar and cops all over the place. Hard to concentrate. Anyway Sotomayor wouldn't make an acceptable JUROR let alone a Judge, and let's not even mention Supreme Court justice. But we aren't gonna stoop her on this blog. Write or Email the Republicans on the Committee ant tell them to keep the nomination bottled up. If not one Repub votes to send the nomination to the floor it dies. And do this for the next 500 people Obama brings on until and unless he realizes he has to ppoint someone acceptable. And f&^k the Mole/Troll. Obama is a gun-grabbing god damned Communist and he must be opposed at every turn. I certainly hope that after we get a Republican check on him next year that we will be able to have him impeached since his appointees derailed prosecution of voter intimidation by the Black Panthers, making Obama IMO an accessory after the fact in the felony of voter intimidation.



Instead of rhetoricspewing, here's a semi-intelligent discussion (at least from most involved) about Sotomayor's nomination. We haven't had anything close to this here, just lots of rhetoric, misinformation, and absolute bull@#$% from Faux News/Alex Jones fans.

http://www.honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2577104
 

R a Z o R

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
861
Location
Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Alexcabbie wrote:




The moles on here are trying desperately to blunt the groundswell attack on the nomination of this ghastly abomination to the Supreme Court. That is the meaning of the attempt to derail the thread, so that it looks like a bunch of BS and arguing instead of a united front.

Ah crap it's 1:35 AM and another brouhaha at the corner bar and cops all over the place. Hard to concentrate. Anyway Sotomayor wouldn't make an acceptable JUROR let alone a Judge, and let's not even mention Supreme Court justice. But we aren't gonna stop her on this blog. Write or Email the Republicans on the Committee ant tell them to keep the nomination bottled up. If not one Repub votes to send the nomination to the floor it dies. And do this for the next 500 people Obama brings on until and unless he realizes he has to ppoint someone acceptable. And f&^k the Mole/Troll. Obama is a gun-grabbing god damned Communist and he must be opposed at every turn. I certainly hope that after we get a Republican check on him next year that we will be able to have him impeached since his appointees derailed prosecution of voter intimidation by the Black Panthers, making Obama IMO an accessory after the fact in the felony of voter intimidation.

Join " Gun Owners of America " to get alerts and premade email addressed to your Reps .

GOA knows that Sotomayor is not a friend of gun owners .

Free to join. Free emails...... FREE GROUNDSWELL ATTACK
 

MSC 45ACP

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Messages
2,840
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

Is anyone really suprised at the dumocrap decision to appoint her? Its right in line with the rest of the silly osamabamamama cabinet and other appointees. Really... Billery as Secretary of State? YOUGOTTABECHITTINME, PRIVATE PYLE!!! She's going to piss off EVERY country on the planet!!!
 
Top