• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Open-carry proponents take a stroll through Minocqua; video included

DanM

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
1,928
Location
West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA
imported post

insane.kangaroo wrote:
N00blet45 wrote:
In the video Harry puts his pinky into the chamber area to check that the weapon is cleared of any ammunition. I've always heard that is a very bad idea because if the slide closes your finger will be in between two pieces of metal rapidly closing together.

Correct. Very bad idea. Very bad habit to get into. Correct training has you check for clearance by opening the action, visually checking, andputting a pen or rod through the barrel downthrough the chamber.


In any firearm training course, you'll be taught to place your pinky in the chamber on pistols, shotguns, and rifles. The point is to make sure the chamber is cleared.

Hundreds of firearms instructors can't be wrong. ;)
Not in *any* course; just the ones that don't know any better. Any instructor that teaches that method IS wrong, and deserves the injury lawsuits they getfrom people maiming or losing fingers due to negligent instruction.
 

J.Gleason

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
3,481
Location
Chilton, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

I have been through three fire arms courses and have always been taught to visually check the chamber for rounds. There should not be any reason why you would not visually see a round in the chamber.

The finger option is a personal preference.

All in All a very nice story and video Ms. Hernandez
 

david.ross

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
1,241
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
imported post

I'm not certain but have a feeling the "sticking the finger in" is so you don't have to turn the weapon. Less time staring at the weapon, more time looking at your surroundings.
 

grishnav

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
736
Location
Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

DanM wrote:
Not in *any* course; just the ones that don't know any better. Any instructor that teaches that method IS wrong, and deserves the injury lawsuits they getfrom people maiming or losing fingers due to negligent instruction.
Having accidentally dropped the slide lock on a Glock while checking the chamber with my pinky, I can tell you that 1. The accident does happen, 2. It does hurt, 3. The injury is incredibly minor; not even anywhere close to being as bad as slamming your fingers in a door, for example.
 

david.ross

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
1,241
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
imported post

grishnav,

same here... I always do a press check. I've put my sweat and blood in to my firearm! ;)

You learn, get used to it, and injuries won't happen.
 

N00blet45

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
475
Location
Walton County, Georgia, ,
imported post

J.Gleason wrote:
I have been through three fire arms courses and have always been taught to visually check the chamber for rounds. There should not be any reason why you would not visually see a round in the chamber.

The finger option is a personal preference.

All in All a very nice story and video Ms. Hernandez
I've always heard of the visual inspection too, never about digit insertion. That's why it seems to foreign to me. Maybe it's because my training came from military instructors and they are used to training the lowest common denominator.
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

I also was taught to check the chamber with my little finger. The rationale given me was to build procedural memory in case of needing to clear the sidearm in low/no light conditions. We were also encouraged to learn to clear, field strip, check for function, reassemble our sidearm and mags as well as unload and load our mags blindfolded (all using snap caps of course for safety).

Being that one of my primary sidearms is an XD which requires that the trigger is pulled to field strip the weapon, I do use the finger sweep technique as I figure that one more double check before pulling that trigger can't hurt, especially in case of low light conditions. I do have at least one sidearm that lacks a frame slide lock with which I suffice with a visual verification, however, the field strip design makes an accidental discharge even if a round was stuck in the chamber very unlikely especially compared to the XD with which an ND would be assured.
 

Airforce1

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
19
Location
Faribault, Minnesota, USA
imported post

N00blet45 wrote:
Here comes the criticism! It's constructive though so bare with me.

I put a comment on the youtube video. In the video Harry puts his pinky into the chamber area to check that the weapon is cleared of any ammunition. I've always heard that is a very bad idea because if the slide closes your finger will be in between two pieces of metal rapidly closing together.

Good job on the walk and the coverage. It's good to see that objective journalism still exists.
Just my 2-cents.

I will have to agree. I did this on 3 different occasions. Once with a SKS to the thumb and a M1 Carbine to a finger. And a friends Sten gun to the skin between the index finger and the thumb. Although these were old arms it can still happen with newer guns of all types. Save yourself from extreme pain and don't stick any body part inside a chamber of a gun. Moving parts and appendages are not a good combo.

Good Artical though. Very Informative and insightful.
 
Top