-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Clallum county park sign.
- Thread starter jeeper1
- Start date
Trigger Dr
Regular Member
imported post
Also, read the bottom line. "If you see a violation in progress...." So give them a call and report the sign violation.
Also, read the bottom line. "If you see a violation in progress...." So give them a call and report the sign violation.
joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
Their actual code, 23.03.090, seems to be in compliance with pre emption. By their wording of "use" it seems that this only restricts the discharge and not possession of a firearm.
Their actual code, 23.03.090, seems to be in compliance with pre emption. By their wording of "use" it seems that this only restricts the discharge and not possession of a firearm.
bugly
Regular Member
imported post
yes, but the sign clearly states "firearms are prohibited", thus being in violation of preemption due to its misleading verbage.
edited for clarification
yes, but the sign clearly states "firearms are prohibited", thus being in violation of preemption due to its misleading verbage.
edited for clarification
joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
bugly wrote:
I hear what you are saying, and am only disagreeing because of the wording of the preemption statute, but since their county ordinance is within the law it needs to be "asked" of them to change their sign to accurately reflect the law as written.
bugly wrote:
No. The sign is not the municipal code. It is a reference, poorly worded but still just a reference, to the actual code that does not restrict the possession of firearms. We can request that the sign be changed to reflect their actual code but it is not in violation of preemption.
I hear what you are saying, and am only disagreeing because of the wording of the preemption statute, but since their county ordinance is within the law it needs to be "asked" of them to change their sign to accurately reflect the law as written.
LibertyNut
New member
imported post
Earlier this year I provided the Clallam Co Parks Dept. with a complete report on all signage, rules, publications and web site statements that are not in compliance with the pre-emption statute. They are cooperative and changes are being made. I will be monitoring their progress and also discussing the County ordinances with the Prosecuting Attorney.
Earlier this year I provided the Clallam Co Parks Dept. with a complete report on all signage, rules, publications and web site statements that are not in compliance with the pre-emption statute. They are cooperative and changes are being made. I will be monitoring their progress and also discussing the County ordinances with the Prosecuting Attorney.
bugly
Regular Member
imported post
good job, the signage should be at least understandable by anyone walking up to it and reading it. there should be no question as to what is meant and nothing misleading in the wording.
good job, the signage should be at least understandable by anyone walking up to it and reading it. there should be no question as to what is meant and nothing misleading in the wording.
Statkowski
Regular Member
imported post
Tape works. Plus, it's a whole bunch of tax dollars cheaper than a new sign.
Tape works. Plus, it's a whole bunch of tax dollars cheaper than a new sign.
Vandal
Regular Member
imported post
Bonus points for both fixing the sign and doing so in a way that saves the taxpayers a little money!
Bonus points for both fixing the sign and doing so in a way that saves the taxpayers a little money!