Washintonian_For_Liberty
Regular Member
imported post
tat2ed_guy wrote:
tat2ed_guy wrote:
Who determines cruelty? You?? This was an animal, not a human, and therefore, there is no cruelty other than some subjective version of it that each person will see differently... to most people in this world, killing a dog is no different than someone picking a carrot and leaving it out to rot. The only reason the person should face any charges at all would be leaving an animal carcass on someone else's property... and if it is public property... they should not even get those charges as an animal rots and is considered biodegradable.DEROS72 wrote:They do if its cruelty. The dog was just left to die, in this case who knows how long it was there or if the one that shot it was even the owner.You don't put someone on trial for shooting a dog.