Filled for renewal5/8/09 did not give proof. 6/11/09 received suspending order.Need advice
Please post the suspending order - who was is signed by, a judge??Filled for renewal5/8/09 did not give proof. 6/11/09 received suspending order.Need advice
He handled this for me. Sadly the appeal didn't go anywhere.Call Richard Gardiner, see http://www.lawyers.com/gardiner/- I think he already handling another similar matter and can advise you; meanhile hang tight and let the courthosue sweat!
OK, but what were your procedural facts - you showed a DL to the judge and he backed down, right?Mike wrote:He handled this for me. Sadly the appeal didn't go anywhere.Call Richard Gardiner, see http://www.lawyers.com/gardiner/- I think he already handling another similar matter and can advise you; meanhile hang tight and let the courthosue sweat!
Yes, the judge accepted that as a "proof"hsmith wrote:OK, but what were your procedural facts - you showed a DL to the judge and he backed down, right?Mike wrote:He handled this for me. Sadly the appeal didn't go anywhere.Call Richard Gardiner, see http://www.lawyers.com/gardiner/- I think he already handling another similar matter and can advise you; meanhile hang tight and let the courthosue sweat!
Proof of residency is necessary to determine eligibility, as the Court can only issue to residents of the jurisdiction of the Court. Remember the mess we had trying to get a replacement CHP with a new address if we moved to another city/countyand our CHP was still unexpired?§ 18.2-308. Personal protection; carrying concealed weapons; when lawful to carry.
D. Any person 21 years of age or older may apply in writing to the clerk of the circuit court of the county or city in which he resides, or if he is a member of the United States Armed Forces, the county or city in which he is domiciled, for a five-year permit to carry a concealed handgun. There shall be no requirement regarding the length of time an applicant has been a resident or domiciliary of the county or city. The application shall be made under oath before a notary or other person qualified to take oaths and shall be made only on a form prescribed by the Department of State Police, in consultation with the Supreme Court, requiring only that information necessary to determine eligibility for the permit.
What needs to happen is for you to be denied - that way you can appeal to the Appeals court and get this quashed. So if you do request and get an ore tenus, just go in and explainthat you have provided all the information required and expect your pemit to be issued or denied.Monday I will file for a hearing on FRI. at 10am. I will go pro say since money is tight and it appears that no lawyer has had any luck in the past on this issue. So any help as far as opinions or rulings or Laws would be appreciated.
+1 I maintain dual residency so this would make things easier on me. The fact that I pay taxes in both states should be more than enough proof. :banghead:Coolman wrote:What needs to happen is for you to be denied - that way you can appeal to the Appeals court and get this quashed. So if you do request and get an ore tenus, just go in and explain that you have provided all the information required and expect your pemit to be issued or denied.Monday I will file for a hearing on FRI. at 10am. I will go pro say since money is tight and it appears that no lawyer has had any luck in the past on this issue. So any help as far as opinions or rulings or Laws would be appreciated.
If you can get denied without the ore tenus, that would be great as well.
Good for you on appealing. Maybe we can get this solved once and for all.Lost my hearing Chief Judge D.J. Smith wanted to hear zilch. Going to look into Appeal :X