imported post
This is pretty interesting, Gun control and removal is included:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
This is pretty interesting, Gun control and removal is included:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
The nut who tried to shoot up the Holocaust Museum tried to "arrest" Volker at the Fed HQ in DC some years ago. Obama's a damn fraud and a nincompoop, but you gotta sift this stuff. Very carefully. I'm only about 3 minutes into this vid but it is starting to sound like some of Lyndon LaRouche's bullcrap.Its more dangerous to do nothing. That is what happened in Germany. Look at the video and see what a kind looking person Hitler was in the footage. There is danger in charisma. The parties are a smoke screen. The private Federal Reserve is the curtain from the Wizard of Oz.
We the People are not that damned stupid.
Onetrick with any report/journalism/book is to sort the facts from the author's evaluations about those facts.SNIP I don't have a whole lot of use for "9/11 truthers". Earlier the same guy said AlQaeda was "an arm of the United States intelligence services". That is lunacy on stilts.
I like thatOnetrick with any report/journalism/book is to sort the facts from the author's evaluations about those facts.
Its entirely possible for lunatics to possess facts.
There's something to what you say; but it's easy to go too far. I've been thinking quite a bit lately about the difference in "real money"--gold or silver--versus the dictionary definition of money, which is "a medium of exchange." We know from history that many, many different things have been used as money. The reason monetary systems came into being in the first placeis because money is many times easier and more convenient than a barter system.Currency has the aspect of convenience in trade, but it also has the undesirable effect of 'putting all your eggs in one basket.' Being dependent on money, and it's value, for all things, is foolish. The more aspects of your life and it's essential needs that you hang on the money tree, the easier you are to bring to your knees when that money fails.
Part of the failure of 'conventional thinking' is a blurring of the line between convenience and helpless dependence. Once the hooks are in... It's just like 'following orders.' You want your family to live, don't you?ixtow wrote:There's something to what you say; but it's easy to go too far. I've been thinking quite a bit lately about the difference in "real money"--gold or silver--versus the dictionary definition of money, which is "a medium of exchange." We know from history that many, many different things have been used as money. The reason monetary systems came into being in the first placeis because money is many times easier and more convenient than a barter system.Currency has the aspect of convenience in trade, but it also has the undesirable effect of 'putting all your eggs in one basket.' Being dependent on money, and it's value, for all things, is foolish. The more aspects of your life and it's essential needs that you hang on the money tree, the easier you are to bring to your knees when that money fails.
In addition, I think that many of us who are influenced by the historical use of precious metals as money tend to place too much emphasis on the "value" of money. Any kind of trade, even the trading of time and labor for pure gold, MUST have value for all parties involved, or the trade will not happen. Anything that is used as money--gold, colored paper, or strange-looking tree leaves--has value to anybody who is willing to use it. Indeed, it is that verywillingness that in the final analysis gives value to money.
Some would have us believe that only government men are interested in power, in maintaining control, in maintaining their privilege.That men interested in power would only do it by setting themselves up in government.Bilderburgers, shadow governments, Kissinger, New World Order etc., etc., etc. Same old crapola in brand new packaging.
Why do the people who make thisjunk go to so much trouble?