imported post
Yes it is. Here's a link:
http://www.city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cityFPC/agendas/090507_ES_2.pdf
Yes it is. Here's a link:
http://www.city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cityFPC/agendas/090507_ES_2.pdf
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Police Chief Ed Flynn Can't Stop Screwing The Public
- Thread starter Pointman
- Start date
imported post
Hugh: here's a link that might explain the Glock situation in Milwaukee:
http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1075040
Also limpwristing is a common cause of stovepiping, I had it happen with a sig when I was practicing with my weak hand. I'm sure if the PO was hit, he wouldn't exactly be at full strength to clear it.
Hugh: here's a link that might explain the Glock situation in Milwaukee:
http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1075040
Also limpwristing is a common cause of stovepiping, I had it happen with a sig when I was practicing with my weak hand. I'm sure if the PO was hit, he wouldn't exactly be at full strength to clear it.
AaronS
Regular Member
imported post
drewdown wrote:
drewdown wrote:
I wish I had the money to run with this. By law, it sounds like it would work.iceman71 wrote:
Indeed it is:
944.16
Whoever does the following is guilty of a Class I Felony:
944.16
(1) A married person who has sexual intercourse with a person not the married person's spouse; or
(2) A person who has sexual intercourse with a person who is married to another.
944.16 - ANNOT.
History: 1977 c. 173; 1993 a. 486; 2001 a.
Nutczak
Regular Member
imported post
AaronS wrote:
I think Flynn should have one of the MPD arrest him and the prosecutor should go forwrd with the case. It would be really nice if one of the major newspapers would publish the fact that he should be cited for his self-admitted illegal acts of adultery. Wouldn't he basically be forced to an arrest then?
AaronS wrote:
Ok, we had a large public figure break current written law in Milwaukee, Why is he not being prosecuted and why isn't the little hose-beast being prosecuted.drewdown wrote:I wish I had the money to run with this. By law, it sounds like it would work.iceman71 wrote:Indeed it is:
944.16
Whoever does the following is guilty of a Class I Felony:
944.16
(1) A married person who has sexual intercourse with a person not the married person's spouse; or
(2) A person who has sexual intercourse with a person who is married to another.
944.16 - ANNOT.
History: 1977 c. 173; 1993 a. 486; 2001 a.
I think Flynn should have one of the MPD arrest him and the prosecutor should go forwrd with the case. It would be really nice if one of the major newspapers would publish the fact that he should be cited for his self-admitted illegal acts of adultery. Wouldn't he basically be forced to an arrest then?
otter
New member
imported post
Nutczak wrote:
Technically speaking, he couldn't be arrested for the crime yet. The DA would need a place and time of the alleged crime to go forward with proceedings.
Saying nothing about the moral issues here, we now have a self-admitted felon running the Milwaukee Police Dept. While I personally feel the statute on adultery is outdated and needs to be repealed, these 'the law is the law' types cannot pick and choose what they are going to enforce. They can't have it both ways; either punish everyone under the laws as they are written, or get these damn laws off the books.
Nutczak wrote:
AaronS wrote:Ok, we had a large public figure break current written law in Milwaukee, Why is he not being prosecuted and why isn't the little hose-beast being prosecuted.drewdown wrote:I wish I had the money to run with this. By law, it sounds like it would work.iceman71 wrote:Indeed it is:
944.16
Whoever does the following is guilty of a Class I Felony:
944.16
(1) A married person who has sexual intercourse with a person not the married person's spouse; or
(2) A person who has sexual intercourse with a person who is married to another.
944.16 - ANNOT.
History: 1977 c. 173; 1993 a. 486; 2001 a.
I think Flynn should have one of the MPD arrest him and the prosecutor should go forwrd with the case. It would be really nice if one of the major newspapers would publish the fact that he should be cited for his self-admitted illegal acts of adultery. Wouldn't he basically be forced to an arrest then?
Technically speaking, he couldn't be arrested for the crime yet. The DA would need a place and time of the alleged crime to go forward with proceedings.
Saying nothing about the moral issues here, we now have a self-admitted felon running the Milwaukee Police Dept. While I personally feel the statute on adultery is outdated and needs to be repealed, these 'the law is the law' types cannot pick and choose what they are going to enforce. They can't have it both ways; either punish everyone under the laws as they are written, or get these damn laws off the books.
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
Nope. First he must be convicted of a crime for which he is at least liable to more than 365 days of incarceration. To do that there must be a criminal complaint or indictment that very often only the state can bring.
Nope. First he must be convicted of a crime for which he is at least liable to more than 365 days of incarceration. To do that there must be a criminal complaint or indictment that very often only the state can bring.
Shotgun
Wisconsin Carry, Inc.
imported post
Wishful thinking everyone, it's not going to happen. When was the last time there was a prosecution for adultery in Wisconsin? Even the statute says it is not the intention of the state to regulate the sexual conduct of consenting adults. If you think the jails are full of people for minor pot possession charges, just imagine how full they'd be if they started prosecuting for adultery. They'd need another prison just to hold the public officials...
Wishful thinking everyone, it's not going to happen. When was the last time there was a prosecution for adultery in Wisconsin? Even the statute says it is not the intention of the state to regulate the sexual conduct of consenting adults. If you think the jails are full of people for minor pot possession charges, just imagine how full they'd be if they started prosecuting for adultery. They'd need another prison just to hold the public officials...
lockman
State Researcher
imported post
Why is it on the books? It is not exactly an antiquated statute if it was passed or revised in 1977. As likely to get a conviction on that as an open carry disorderly conduct charge.
Why is it on the books? It is not exactly an antiquated statute if it was passed or revised in 1977. As likely to get a conviction on that as an open carry disorderly conduct charge.
Flipper
Campaign Veteran
imported post
No Utah CC permit for "In Like Flynn" if he gets convicted of his "moral turpitude" offense.:what:
http://www.gunthorp.com/Carry%20Application%20Utah.htm
No Utah CC permit for "In Like Flynn" if he gets convicted of his "moral turpitude" offense.:what:
http://www.gunthorp.com/Carry%20Application%20Utah.htm
lockman
State Researcher
imported post
It's a FELONY!
It's a FELONY!
iceman71
Regular Member
imported post
thats right. If we are guna be treated like criminals for oc'ing then he should be treated same way. Seeing as his is a real crime. Dumb one on books, but still a crime.
thats right. If we are guna be treated like criminals for oc'ing then he should be treated same way. Seeing as his is a real crime. Dumb one on books, but still a crime.
J.Gleason
Banned
imported post
People should start calling the DA's office and demanding equal treatment.
People should start calling the DA's office and demanding equal treatment.
pvtschultz
Campaign Veteran
imported post
I think a few letters to the editor at the JS is due here folks. I'll try to put something together during lunch, but I'm affraid that I may not have the time to put together an effect argument (plus I am an engineer by trade and literacy is NOT my strong point :dude
.
I think a few letters to the editor at the JS is due here folks. I'll try to put something together during lunch, but I'm affraid that I may not have the time to put together an effect argument (plus I am an engineer by trade and literacy is NOT my strong point :dude
.
Brass Magnet
Founder's Club Member
imported post
pvtschultz wrote:
pvtschultz wrote:
That's 'cause you're one of them Mechanical EnGiNeErS. Being a Manufacturing Engineer, I can read.... unless it's a blueprint from a Mechanical EnGiNeEr.I think a few letters to the editor at the JS is due here folks. I'll try to put something together during lunch, but I'm affraid that I may not have the time to put together an effect argument (plus I am an engineer by trade and literacy is NOT my strong point :dude
pvtschultz
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Brass Magnet wrote:
Brass Magnet wrote:
Ya got me on that one :banghead:.pvtschultz wrote:That's 'cause you're one of them Mechanical EnGiNeErS. Being a Manufacturing Engineer, I can read.... unless it's a blueprint from a Mechanical EnGiNeEr.I think a few letters to the editor at the JS is due here folks. I'll try to put something together during lunch, but I'm affraid that I may not have the time to put together an effect argument (plus I am an engineer by trade and literacy is NOT my strong point :dude
pvtschultz
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Well, a group of citizens is filing a formal complaint against Fuher Flynn. It is a class I felony, the same as, hmm, carrying a firearm in a "school zone".
http://www.wisn.com/news/19868552/detail.html
Well, a group of citizens is filing a formal complaint against Fuher Flynn. It is a class I felony, the same as, hmm, carrying a firearm in a "school zone".
http://www.wisn.com/news/19868552/detail.html
springfield 1911
Founder's Club Member
imported post
June 30, 2009
Heard on wisn 12 at 6:00 pm da not to charge flynn for adultery couldn't find story on line.
http://www.wisn.com/news/19911241/detail.html
MILWAUKEE -- Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn will not face criminal charges for his extra-marital affair.
A community activist group filed a complaint against the chief last week, claiming he should face criminal charges for adultery.
Adultery is illegal in Wisconsin, but the law hasn't been enforced in decades.
The district attorney said that's why the chief won't face criminal charges. Activists said the case isn't over yet.
I think we need to exercise patience in this situation and let them proceed with some of the things they have at work already. And that's all I can say at this particular time," community activist Lamonte Harris said.
The district attorney said he has no intention of charging the chief with a crime.
June 30, 2009
Heard on wisn 12 at 6:00 pm da not to charge flynn for adultery couldn't find story on line.
http://www.wisn.com/news/19911241/detail.html
MILWAUKEE -- Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn will not face criminal charges for his extra-marital affair.
A community activist group filed a complaint against the chief last week, claiming he should face criminal charges for adultery.
Adultery is illegal in Wisconsin, but the law hasn't been enforced in decades.
The district attorney said that's why the chief won't face criminal charges. Activists said the case isn't over yet.
I think we need to exercise patience in this situation and let them proceed with some of the things they have at work already. And that's all I can say at this particular time," community activist Lamonte Harris said.
The district attorney said he has no intention of charging the chief with a crime.
since9
Campaign Veteran
imported post
"On April 20, 2009, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen issued a memorandum to district attorneys stating that open carry was legal and does not warrant a charge of disorderly conduct. Despite the memo, Milwaukee police chief Ed Flynn instructed his officers to take down anyone with a firearm, take the gun away, and then determine if the individual could legally carry it." - Wikipedia
So whatever happened to Ed Flynn? Is he still in office after instructing his officers to commit such a heinous action?
"On April 20, 2009, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen issued a memorandum to district attorneys stating that open carry was legal and does not warrant a charge of disorderly conduct. Despite the memo, Milwaukee police chief Ed Flynn instructed his officers to take down anyone with a firearm, take the gun away, and then determine if the individual could legally carry it." - Wikipedia
So whatever happened to Ed Flynn? Is he still in office after instructing his officers to commit such a heinous action?