Citizen
Founder's Club Member
imported post
From Ohio vs Holly (June 2009):
[align=left]...A person may not be detained, even momentarily, without reasonable, objective grounds to do so. State v. Robinette (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 240, citing Florida v. Royer (1983), 460 U.S. 491, 497-498, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229...[/align]
[align=left]...Despite the State’s argument that Holly was stopped because the police had a reasonable suspicion that he was engaged in drug activity, Detective Mitchell’s testimony was clear: the only reason Holly was stopped was to determine his identity. In America, however, the police may not stop an individual for the sole purpose of compelling him to identify himself...[/align]
[align=left]It might be kinda handy to check out that cited case, Florida vs Royer.[/align]
From Ohio vs Holly (June 2009):
[align=left]...A person may not be detained, even momentarily, without reasonable, objective grounds to do so. State v. Robinette (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 240, citing Florida v. Royer (1983), 460 U.S. 491, 497-498, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229...[/align]
[align=left]...Despite the State’s argument that Holly was stopped because the police had a reasonable suspicion that he was engaged in drug activity, Detective Mitchell’s testimony was clear: the only reason Holly was stopped was to determine his identity. In America, however, the police may not stop an individual for the sole purpose of compelling him to identify himself...[/align]
[align=left]It might be kinda handy to check out that cited case, Florida vs Royer.[/align]