• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

University firearm issue upate

rds801

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
84
Location
, Oregon, USA
imported post

http://www.oregoncatalyst.com/index.php/archives/2483-Representative-Kim-Thatcher-University-firearm-issue-update.html

University System “Non-Response” on Firearms Issue
By State Representative Kim Thatcher,

(Salem) The Oregon University System (OUS) responded to a letter from 34 legislators urging them to revise their policies on whether holders of a Concealed Handgun License (CHL) could carry firearms on campus. Below is a statement by State Representative Kim Thatcher (R-Keizer, Newberg, St. Paul) regarding this new development.

“While I thank the University System for their consideration of this matter, the response we received is a ‘non-response’. The outcome of the case in Medford could take years to resolve if it goes all the way to the US Supreme Court level. Meanwhile, lawful citizens of our state are being denied a legal right to have firearms on our college campuses if they have a CHL. I find it ironic that the OUS wants to leave the final decision up to the Oregon Legislature since it is that body which already passed a state law stating very clearly that CHL holders are allowed to carry on University campuses. The fact remains that people with CHLs are expected to, and do conduct themselves to a higher standard than most people. Their ability to conduct themselves properly does not end the moment they cross the property line of a college. I would hate to see further legal action, but that may be the only remedy for some of the parties at this point. I do appreciate the University System’s willingness to review this matter, I am hopeful the policies will change to comply with current Oregon law as soon as possible.”



For further background on this issue use the following links:

1) Letter from OUS to Legislators June 30th, 2009

http://www.leg.state.or.us/press_releases/thatcher_061809.pdf

2) Letter Sent to OUS June 18th, 2009 http://www.leg.state.or.us/press_releases/thatcher_061809.pdf

http://www.leg.state.or.us/press_releases/thatcher_061809.pdf

3) Letter Sent to OUS February 6th, 2009

http://www.leg.state.or.us/press_releases/thatcher_020609.pdf

4) Oregon Revised Statues 166.170 Oregon Revised Statutes 166.370

http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/home.htm
 

Ironbar

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
385
Location
Tigard, Oregon, USA
imported post

Holy smokes! You mean there's a legislator with a grain of common sense in Oregon?? Whod'a thunk it??!!:celebrate
 

Xader

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
70
Location
, Oregon, USA
imported post

Well, to be perfectly honest: OUS's policy against CCW in no way deterred me from CC-ing while I was attending classes in one of their Universities before I graduated last month.

I broke no laws, only illegal rules. I feel no remorse.
I WILL NOT leave myself defenseless due to their hoplophobia...:cuss:
 

We-the-People

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,221
Location
White City, Oregon, USA
imported post

New member here, mostly because of this issue having "gotten under my skin".

I'm a vet that will be attending Junior and then SOU for the next four years, hopefully starting this semester if the VA get's moving. I've always been one of those that walks past "no guns" signs when I know I'm legal and have no intention of leaving my personal protection in the hands of a university system simply because they have an illegal (per state law) administrative rule.

I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one who choses to exercise my rights and not allow those rights to be intimidated away from me.
 
Top