on line CWP classes

imported post

rob99vmi04 wrote:

peter nap wrote:

You read too fast. Go back and reread my post:?

Click to expand...

I'm confused.

I see :banghead: Little orange dude beating his head against the wall.

and this:

"So I gather you are in favor of government approval before anyone carries a gun either concealed or Open?"

Click to expand...

You must be using Firefox and it's stuck in back when ...mode

The post says:

Edited because I didn't read the whole post!:uhoh:

imported post

rob99vmi04 wrote: Training is an important factor; however, in any fashion it should not be mandatory.

[line]
I know for a fact you,Peter and I ( & many others)agree on this one.

imported post

Edited because I'm too slow on the trigger finger and my post was OBE (Overtaken By Events).

~ Boyd

imported post

Agent19 wrote:

rob99vmi04 wrote: Training is an important factor; however, in any fashion it should not be mandatory.

Click to expand...

[line]

Click to expand...

I know for a fact you,Peter and I ( & many others)agree on this one.

Click to expand...

Of course!First I highly doubt there is any significant difference of peoplepulling guns when their not supposed to ormissing their target and hitting something or someone they are not supposed to between states with heavy requirements (like texas) vs. states with no requirements (Vermont/Alaska).

However, even the aboveis irrelavant looking at the original picture that is the 2nd, because I dont' see the word Training appear in the 27 words of the 2nd Amendment nor do I see Hunting/Sport Shooting appear either. Yet I do see the words Keep /Bear"shall not be infringed". Which if you add a training requirement to the mix, and a 45 day wait , I view that as an infringement.