seattleric007
Banned
imported post
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Interactions with Seattle Police the last month.
- Thread starter seattleric007
- Start date
antispam540
Regular Member
imported post
No, it's not, unless there is
1) RAS that you are committing, have committed, or are going to commit a crime (to actually stop you)
2) RAS that you're armed AND dangerous to pat you down and check your gun's serial number.
OCing is not RAS of a crime, unless it's in violation of 9.41.270 and warrants alarm for the safety of others (like if you were carrying an assault rifle in a "combative stance") or holding the gun in your hand (although I'm not sure if that warrants alarm or not), or if someone matching your description just committed a crime nearby.
No, it's not, unless there is
1) RAS that you are committing, have committed, or are going to commit a crime (to actually stop you)
2) RAS that you're armed AND dangerous to pat you down and check your gun's serial number.
OCing is not RAS of a crime, unless it's in violation of 9.41.270 and warrants alarm for the safety of others (like if you were carrying an assault rifle in a "combative stance") or holding the gun in your hand (although I'm not sure if that warrants alarm or not), or if someone matching your description just committed a crime nearby.
FMCDH
Regular Member
imported post
jbone wrote:
jbone wrote:
Actually, you get all the above for no extra charge.
Mike
Site Co-Founder
imported post
seattleric007 wrote:
seattleric007 wrote:
No, police stop just to check you out (absent of reasonable suspicion of crime) violates 4th amendment and is actionable for damages. Worse, police following this protocol are idiots as bad guys will be able to get any evidence obtained suppressed and get away without the criminal penalty they deserve.
