• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Sotomayor grilling on Second Amendment begins

R a Z o R

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
861
Location
Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
imported post

I was gravely disappointed in Judge Sotomayor's referencing the Second Amendment in the terms of hunting rights .

Orrin Hatch gave Sonia Sotomayor a better grilling over the Right to Keep and Bear Arms . Senator Hatch carrys a North American Arms mini revolver .

The Obama Standard of transnationalism must be fought and stopped .

UNITE & VOTE * 2010 & 2012 :quirky:quirky

Ignorance can not be blamed at our highest levels of government . The criminal left wing extremist must be exposed .

As a moderate centrist I am getting scared .
 

smoking357

Banned
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
1,100
Location
Pierce is a Coward, ,
imported post

Dave Workman wrote:
Sotomayor grilling on Second Amendment begins, and she won't say how she would vote on incorporation of Second Amendment to the states.

http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m7d14-Sotomayor-will-not-answer-how-she-would-vote-on-incorporation-of-2A

If that doesn't work, try this:

http://tinyurl.com/mmv4m4
She's an absolutely horrible person and a judge who believes the law is her own opinion.

If she'll bring this country closer to a breakup, let's install her with all haste.
 

zoom6zoom

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
1,694
Location
Dale City, VA, Virginia, USA
imported post

Have you noticed that when she's asked questions by democrats the answers come right out and they are smooth and polished, but when questioned by repubs it's the opposite? It's always nice getting the questions ahead of the test.

I don't care about her race or gender. To my way of thinking, someone who's decisions have already been overturned by the SC as often as hers shouldn't even be under consideration.
 

smoking357

Banned
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
1,100
Location
Pierce is a Coward, ,
imported post

zoom6zoom wrote:
Have you noticed that when she's asked questions by democrats the answers come right out and they are smooth and polished, but when questioned by repubs it's the opposite? It's always nice getting the questions ahead of the test.

I don't care about her race or gender. To my way of thinking, someone who's decisions have already been overturned by the SC as often as hers shouldn't even be under consideration.
Ever notice that there's no hard-core pro-Liberty Federal judges?
 

shad0wfax

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
1,069
Location
Spokane, Washington, USA
imported post

smoking357 wrote:
Ever notice that there's no hard-core pro-Liberty Federal judges?

That's because the incrementalist/socialists "Bork" them all. As SCOTUS Justices go, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito aren't terribly bad. Kennedy is a flip-flopper and the rest are Marxists. We had a winner when Robert Bork got nominated and then the Marxists in the Senate went nuts and refused to confirm him. The moronic middle-of-the-road bi-partisan compromiser goons (Republicans) who let incrementalists (Democrats) swing our country farther and farther towards socialism need to grow backbones and "Bork" Sotomayor, but I don't see it happening.
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

shad0wfax wrote:
That's because the incrementalist/socialists "Bork" them all. As SCOTUS Justices go, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito aren't terribly bad. Kennedy is a flip-flopper and the rest are Marxists. We had a winner when Robert Bork got nominated and then the Marxists in the Senate went nuts and refused to confirm him. The moronic middle-of-the-road bi-partisan compromiser goons (Republicans) who let incrementalists (Democrats) swing our country farther and farther towards socialism need to grow backbones and "Bork" Sotomayor, but I don't see it happening.

lulzz
 

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

In re 'wise Latina', does no one else know how to say 'wise woman' in Old English?

From Old English wiċċa m., wiċċe f., from Proto-Germanic *vikkan, from Proto-Indo-European *weik-.
edit] Noun Singular
witch

Plural
witches
witch (pluralwitches)
  1. A (usually female) person who is learned in and actively practices witchcraft (according to the OED, its use in the masculine is "now only dialectal").
 
Top