View Poll Results: Does a law abider have the right of ' Self Defense ' ?

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    31 100.00%
  • No

    0 0%
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Poll ... Do I have the right of . .' Self Defense '. . ?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    YES or NO . . . . . VOTE BUTTON IS WAY TO THE RIGHT

    __________________

    And then the grey areas .

    ______________________

    Judge Sotomayor is refusing to answer the most basic questions even with the luxury of adding all the grey and time needed .

    Why ?




  2. #2
    Regular Member Machoduck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Covington, WA & Keenesburg, CO
    Posts
    566

    Post imported post

    To paraphrase Ayn Rand, only in a society of cannibals would the right of self defense come into question.

    MD

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Left Coast, , USA
    Posts
    228

    Post imported post

    R a Z o R wrote:

    Judge Sotomayor is refusing to answer the most basic questions even with the luxury of adding all the grey and time needed .

    Why ?




    For the same reason that all recent supreme court nominees have refused to answer the most basic questions. They have been taught that answering a politician's "simple" question is the quickest path to an ideological ambush.

  4. #4
    Regular Member rodbender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Navasota, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,524

    Post imported post

    Law abider? Everyone has a right to self defense, even the most vile of our society.

    Edit: Except pedifiles.
    The thing about common sense is....it ain't too common.
    Will Rogers

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    2,247

    Post imported post

    rodbender wrote:
    Law abider? Everyone has a right to self defense, even the most vile of our society.

    Edit: Except pedifiles.
    Your edit is an excellent example of once you accept any exception to the rule then where do you draw the line. If you deny pedifiles then someone else comes up with some other type vile person then we reach where we are today. Accepting one exception is opening it up to more. If you say private citizens can't have nukes then where do you draw the line.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    694

    Post imported post

    It's pedophiles.
    Perhaps if you would use a real computer you wouldn't have to apologize for not being able to do so many things on the internet!

  7. #7
    Regular Member LeMat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Kalispell, Montana, USA
    Posts
    162

    Post imported post

    Of course. But it doesn't really matter what we think, does it.
    "Never belittle someone for carrying a small firearm. Commend them for carrying a firearm."
    -OpenCarry.org member MAC702

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rockingham, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    861

    Post imported post

    LeMat wrote:
    Of course. But it doesn't really matter what we think, does it.
    It does for this one .

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N47 12 x W122 10
    Posts
    1,762

    Post imported post

    Your poll is flawed. I can vote for both choices.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,607

    Post imported post

    Question that comes to mind when reading your poll as written...

    When would you not have the right to self defense if you were a law abiding citizen?




  11. #11
    Regular Member Washintonian_For_Liberty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mercer Island, Washington, USA
    Posts
    922

    Post imported post

    deanf wrote:
    Your poll is flawed. I can vote for both choices.
    Its designed for politicians.
    Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. ~ George Washington

  12. #12
    State Researcher HankT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Invisible Mode
    Posts
    6,217

    Post imported post

    PT111 wrote:
    rodbender wrote:
    ...Except pedifiles.
    Your edit is an excellent example of once you accept any exception to the rule then where do you draw the line. If you deny pedifiles then someone else comes up with some other type vile person then we reach where we are today....
    http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/c41.../the-pedi-file

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •