• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Anyone know about this?

suntzu

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
1,230
Location
The south land
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
http://www.infowars .com/images/ firearms- letter.png BATF essentially tellin' TN FFL licensees that a new TN law passed on 19 June is in violation of Fed Law. I'm just passing it on... 'causeI have no idea.
I've seen it. They said that Fed law trumps state law--personally I think state law should trump most federal laws, as many of the recent acts by Congress are 10th Amendment violations.

The Act the memo is referring to is a 10th Amendment Act recently passed by the Tn. legislature...

I keep hoping for the day the NFA is repealed, or the states simply tell the federal government where to shove it....not likely to happen I admit--but I continue to hope anyway.
 

Fallguy

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
715
Location
McKenzie Tennessee, USA
imported post

One thing I've always thought (and I could be wrong) is that the ATF has the ability to regulate firearms because most, if not all, travel in interstate commerce.

...and that the whole purpose of this law and similar ones in other states, was that if a firearm does not travel in interstate commerce, then the federal government/ATF has no lawful means to regulate it.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Fallguy wrote:
One thing I've always thought (and I could be wrong) is that the ATF has the ability to regulate firearms because most, if not all, travel in interstate commerce.

...and that the whole purpose of this law and similar ones in other states, was that if a firearm does not travel in interstate commerce, then the federal government/ATF has no lawful means to regulate it.
'Regulate' means 'to make regular'... not dictate. This is a 10A issue that I'm sure TN will address. 'Should be interesting.
 
Top