Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: This is sickening

  1. #1
    Accomplished Advocate
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bedford, Texas, USA
    Posts
    834

    Post imported post

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20...html?viewAll=y


    WHEN AGNES LAWLESS and three friends were inside a Lukoil convenience store in the Northeast at 3 a.m. last August, they'd all but forgotten the fender-bender in which they'd been involved moments earlier. There was little damage, and the other driver had left the scene, near Northeast Philadelphia Airport. What they didn't know was that they'd been rear-ended by the son of a police officer who was on duty, and dad was about to get involved. Lawless was standing at the counter of the store, at Comly Road and Roosevelt Boulevard, smiling and chatting with the clerk, when she was grabbed from behind and violently pushed back with a police officer's gun in her face. "He hit me with his left hand, and he had his gun in his right hand," Lawless said. "He pushed his gun into the left side of my neck. It caused a scrape-type bruise on my neck." After a chaotic struggle, Lawless was arrested and charged with assaulting the officer. Lawless and her three friends, all in their early 20s, filed complaints with the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau. But in cases in which it's a defendant's word against a police officer's, the benefit of doubt often falls to the cop. Except when there's video.
    There is zero excuse for this violent and deadly assault. Whats worse is that OTHER police officers would try to get this store clerk to erase the evidence of their criminal conduct. What takes the cake is that the judge, DA, and PD have taken almost no punitive action, even allowing this violent bully back on the streets with a weapon.

    can any of you LEOs find any reason for this dismissal?

  2. #2
    Regular Member Decoligny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rosamond, California, USA
    Posts
    1,865

    Post imported post

    DKSuddeth wrote:
    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20...html?viewAll=y


    WHEN AGNES LAWLESS and three friends were inside a Lukoil convenience store in the Northeast at 3 a.m. last August, they'd all but forgotten the fender-bender in which they'd been involved moments earlier. There was little damage, and the other driver had left the scene, near Northeast Philadelphia Airport. What they didn't know was that they'd been rear-ended by the son of a police officer who was on duty, and dad was about to get involved. Lawless was standing at the counter of the store, at Comly Road and Roosevelt Boulevard, smiling and chatting with the clerk, when she was grabbed from behind and violently pushed back with a police officer's gun in her face. "He hit me with his left hand, and he had his gun in his right hand," Lawless said. "He pushed his gun into the left side of my neck. It caused a scrape-type bruise on my neck." After a chaotic struggle, Lawless was arrested and charged with assaulting the officer. Lawless and her three friends, all in their early 20s, filed complaints with the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau. But in cases in which it's a defendant's word against a police officer's, the benefit of doubt often falls to the cop. Except when there's video.
    There is zero excuse for this violent and deadly assault. Whats worse is that OTHER police officers would try to get this store clerk to erase the evidence of their criminal conduct. What takes the cake is that the judge, DA, and PD have taken almost no punitive action, even allowing this violent bully back on the streets with a weapon.

    can any of you LEOs find any reason for this dismissal?
    Who died in this assualt?

  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,544

    Post imported post

    Decoligny wrote:
    DKSuddeth wrote:
    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20...html?viewAll=y


    WHEN AGNES LAWLESS and three friends were inside a Lukoil convenience store in the Northeast at 3 a.m. last August, they'd all but forgotten the fender-bender in which they'd been involved moments earlier. There was little damage, and the other driver had left the scene, near Northeast Philadelphia Airport. What they didn't know was that they'd been rear-ended by the son of a police officer who was on duty, and dad was about to get involved. Lawless was standing at the counter of the store, at Comly Road and Roosevelt Boulevard, smiling and chatting with the clerk, when she was grabbed from behind and violently pushed back with a police officer's gun in her face. "He hit me with his left hand, and he had his gun in his right hand," Lawless said. "He pushed his gun into the left side of my neck. It caused a scrape-type bruise on my neck." After a chaotic struggle, Lawless was arrested and charged with assaulting the officer. Lawless and her three friends, all in their early 20s, filed complaints with the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau. But in cases in which it's a defendant's word against a police officer's, the benefit of doubt often falls to the cop. Except when there's video.
    There is zero excuse for this violent and deadly assault. Whats worse is that OTHER police officers would try to get this store clerk to erase the evidence of their criminal conduct. What takes the cake is that the judge, DA, and PD have taken almost no punitive action, even allowing this violent bully back on the streets with a weapon.

    can any of you LEOs find any reason for this dismissal?
    Who died in this assualt?
    Semantics. how about "Assault with a deadly weapon" ? Either way, it's a federal offense, among other things. It's 10 years federal time for the assault with his gun under color of law, and I'm sure there are some state laws that were broken too.

    Add to that the conspiracy charge for every officer that intimidated the store to erase the evidence, that's another 1 year apiece in the Federal Pen., and loss of the badge and gun rights for life.

  4. #4
    Accomplished Advocate
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bedford, Texas, USA
    Posts
    834

    Post imported post

    Decoligny wrote:
    DKSuddeth wrote:
    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20...html?viewAll=y


    WHEN AGNES LAWLESS and three friends were inside a Lukoil convenience store in the Northeast at 3 a.m. last August, they'd all but forgotten the fender-bender in which they'd been involved moments earlier. There was little damage, and the other driver had left the scene, near Northeast Philadelphia Airport. What they didn't know was that they'd been rear-ended by the son of a police officer who was on duty, and dad was about to get involved. Lawless was standing at the counter of the store, at Comly Road and Roosevelt Boulevard, smiling and chatting with the clerk, when she was grabbed from behind and violently pushed back with a police officer's gun in her face. "He hit me with his left hand, and he had his gun in his right hand," Lawless said. "He pushed his gun into the left side of my neck. It caused a scrape-type bruise on my neck." After a chaotic struggle, Lawless was arrested and charged with assaulting the officer. Lawless and her three friends, all in their early 20s, filed complaints with the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau. But in cases in which it's a defendant's word against a police officer's, the benefit of doubt often falls to the cop. Except when there's video.
    There is zero excuse for this violent and deadly assault. Whats worse is that OTHER police officers would try to get this store clerk to erase the evidence of their criminal conduct. What takes the cake is that the judge, DA, and PD have taken almost no punitive action, even allowing this violent bully back on the streets with a weapon.

    can any of you LEOs find any reason for this dismissal?
    Who died in this assualt?
    I said 'deadly' for a reason, not fatal. by having that gun jammed in to her neck, she was at risk of losing her life by a totally deranged bully with a badge.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,416

    Post imported post

    It will sure be interesting to hear the cop apologists on this one. That there were no charges against Officer Lopez, his son, or the other officers who tried to cover this up is a very solid indication that that whole jurisdiction is dirty.



  6. #6
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    Who do they think they are, the Chicago Police Department?
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,155

    Post imported post

    Office of the Mayor ("A new day. A new way.")

    The Honorable Michael A. Nutter

    1600 Arch St., Suite 4

    Philadelphia, PA 19103



    WRITE HIM LETTERS!



    DEMAND HE DO SOMETHING!

  8. #8
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    I am amazed and sickened that he was not fired!!!
    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,155

    Post imported post

    My e-mail sent to the newspaper's reporter:

    Follow up on this. Behaviour like this, especially from a police officer, is unexcusable. Aggravated assault, terroristic threatening, perjury, conspiracy, and a few other crimes were all committed by Officer Lopez. Had you or I done something similar we'd be shuffling off directly to a state prison somewhere.

    And the "officers" from Internal Affairs found no misconduct with the officers who attempted to get the video tapes erased? What kind of mind-altering drugs are these people on? Forgive my ignorance, but I was under the assumption that witness intimidation and attempted tampering with evidence was a crime. Oh, I forgot, these were Philadelphia's "finest" doing such, so it must be okay.

    And you wonder why the rest of the state has such disdain for Philadelphia?

  10. #10
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    Fox is supposed to cover this story this morning.
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  11. #11
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    It's the next segment on Fox News.
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  12. #12
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    Mercedes Colwin must be smoking crack.
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  13. #13
    Accomplished Advocate
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bedford, Texas, USA
    Posts
    834

    Post imported post

    i missed the segment, what happened?

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    , Oregon, USA
    Posts
    84

    Post imported post

    I can't believe the officer was allowed back on duty after that. This will definitely come back to hurt him and the department. He has already proven he can't be trusted and the other officers that tried to get the clerk to erase the tapes can't be trusted either.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The south land
    Posts
    1,230

    Post imported post

    this is just further proof that the police are just as bad for the most part as the criminals they claim to chase..

    when a criminal wears a badge--who is safe?

  16. #16
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766

    Post imported post

    suntzu wrote:
    this is just further proof that the police are just as bad for the most part as the criminals they claim to chase..

    when a criminal wears a badge--who is safe?
    Hey!!!! I am the forum Chief LEO Basher!!

    You will avoid generalities that encroach on my perogative. :P

    You may say, "This is just further proof that some police are just as bad for the most part as the criminals they claim to chase."


    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  17. #17
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    DKSuddeth wrote:
    i missed the segment, what happened?
    The hostess was somewhat off the mark, but was very definitive that the officer should be fired. Mercedes Colwin tried to take the cop's side and just ended up looking like a blithering idiot. She apparently either hadn't heard about the attempts to tamper with evidence or was trying to softpedal them until the hostess mentioned them.

    The victim needs to sue and NOT settle. The PATTERN of misconduct by MULTIPLE police officers is so blatant (and documented multiple ways) that a jury will give her whatever she asks for.
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  18. #18
    Campaign Veteran Right Wing Wacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Marysville, Washington, USA
    Posts
    645

    Post imported post

    Any testimony any of these officers give in court is now suspect. Any good defense attorney will play this for all it's worth!

  19. #19
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    Right Wing Wacko wrote:
    Any testimony any of these officers give in court is now suspect. Any good defense attorney will play this for all it's worth!
    It must be hard to advance as a police officer if you can NEVER testify in court...
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  20. #20
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    538

    Post imported post

    He's been removed from duty now.

    There needs to be pressure on the DA to press criminal charges.

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20...reet_duty.html

  21. #21
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Monroeville, Pa., ,
    Posts
    73

    Post imported post

    DKSuddeth wrote:
    Decoligny wrote:
    DKSuddeth wrote:
    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20...html?viewAll=y


    WHEN AGNES LAWLESS and three friends were inside a Lukoil convenience store in the Northeast at 3 a.m. last August, they'd all but forgotten the fender-bender in which they'd been involved moments earlier. There was little damage, and the other driver had left the scene, near Northeast Philadelphia Airport. What they didn't know was that they'd been rear-ended by the son of a police officer who was on duty, and dad was about to get involved. Lawless was standing at the counter of the store, at Comly Road and Roosevelt Boulevard, smiling and chatting with the clerk, when she was grabbed from behind and violently pushed back with a police officer's gun in her face. "He hit me with his left hand, and he had his gun in his right hand," Lawless said. "He pushed his gun into the left side of my neck. It caused a scrape-type bruise on my neck." After a chaotic struggle, Lawless was arrested and charged with assaulting the officer. Lawless and her three friends, all in their early 20s, filed complaints with the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau. But in cases in which it's a defendant's word against a police officer's, the benefit of doubt often falls to the cop. Except when there's video.
    There is zero excuse for this violent and deadly assault. Whats worse is that OTHER police officers would try to get this store clerk to erase the evidence of their criminal conduct. What takes the cake is that the judge, DA, and PD have taken almost no punitive action, even allowing this violent bully back on the streets with a weapon.

    can any of you LEOs find any reason for this dismissal?
    Who died in this assualt?
    I said 'deadly' for a reason, not fatal. by having that gun jammed in to her neck, she was at risk of losing her life by a totally deranged bully with a badge.
    "Who died in this assault"? You're a cop, right?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •