TheMrMitch
Regular Member
imported post
One of my granddaughters......................................
One of my granddaughters......................................
he just hasnt seen it yet....I can't believe Hank "T" isn't on here advocating that the kid was in the wrong, and should have done all in his power to DE escalate the situation,, screaming BAD SHOOT !!:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:and that the kid was just itching to get him some Blood!!
I know I'm going to sound like an asshat here BUT....it was not too long ago that we left 8-10 year old kids at home by themselves all the time while the parents were out working in the back 40 or hunting. We've been so vaginized in this society to believe that children are helpless. We've made them that way through our coddling.
I have no doubt that I could leave my 8 year old daughter to baby sit my 3 year old daughter. Would I? No. I'd get raked over the coals if one of my hippy neighbors called CPS. My point is that I don't think it's that big of a deal that they were home alone. And obviously the mother has done something right with these kids.
agreedgsx1138 wrote:I know I'm going to sound like an asshat here BUT....it was not too long ago that we left 8-10 year old kids at home by themselves all the time while the parents were out working in the back 40 or hunting. We've been so vaginized in this society to believe that children are helpless. We've made them that way through our coddling.
I have no doubt that I could leave my 8 year old daughter to baby sit my 3 year old daughter. Would I? No. I'd get raked over the coals if one of my hippy neighbors called CPS. My point is that I don't think it's that big of a deal that they were home alone. And obviously the mother has done something right with these kids.
+1000
If that town doesn't put that Mother in for A Mother Of The Year Award, The whole town should be shot!!
gsx1138 wrote:I know I'm going to sound like an asshat here BUT....it was not too long ago that we left 8-10 year old kids at home by themselves all the time while the parents were out working in the back 40 or hunting. We've been so vaginized in this society to believe that children are helpless. We've made them that way through our coddling.
I have no doubt that I could leave my 8 year old daughter to baby sit my 3 year old daughter. Would I? No. I'd get raked over the coals if one of my hippy neighbors called CPS. My point is that I don't think it's that big of a deal that they were home alone. And obviously the mother has done something right with these kids.
+1000
If that town doesn't put that Mother in for A Mother Of The Year Award, The whole town should be shot!!
It doesn't say they were unarmed either but it does say they threatened the kids so they must have been armed with something. I really can't say that two grown men facing to kids like this can be considered unarmed. Too many kids dying of child abuse from parents who are unarmed to consider this an unarmed situation in any stretch of the imagination.I don't see it written that the home invaders were armed.
So, according to HankT, the boy should have held his fire and wrestled with the three thugs instead, and his little sister would've been just fine.
I have a baby sister. Well, she's married and has a kid, now, so she's not really a baby. But she's still my baby sister. And I will still do very bad things to anyone who threatens her. So I empathize deeply with the boy in this story.
HankT's postulate notwithstanding.
Looks legit to me as far as the picture dictates, he's at the range w/ Father/supervision only one shooting, that little man is the active firing line..To be politically correct he's the length of his sneakers across the black line.. If your gonna pick on the little man, suggest eye protection...40 Cal wrote:Sorry, but the RSO training is coming out, he should be standing behind the firing line, not in front of it. Let's teach them safety as well.I agree with teaching proper gun control early... use both hands, son!
Not intending to pick on anyone, and yes, he needs eye protection. The red line should be at the front edge of the benches. Also, if you look closely at the picture you will see that the "black line" is actually a gap between the concrete pad and what appears to be a wooden beam laying on the ground, so he is essentially standing on a beam which would limit the stability of his stance.rpyne wrote:Looks legit to me as far as the picture dictates, he's at the range w/ Father/supervision only one shooting, that little man is the active firing line..To be politically correct he's the length of his sneakers across the black line.. If your gonna pick on the little man, suggest eye protection...40 Cal wrote:Sorry, but the RSO training is coming out, he should be standing behind the firing line, not in front of it. Let's teach them safety as well.I agree with teaching proper gun control early... use both hands, son!
Notice too that there was no follow-up on the boy being taken to a detention center either.protias wrote:The kids did a good job. I just hope the mom doesn't get charged with leaving a loaded firearm near where a minor can get a hold of it.
And that is the problem in many states....
In NC, you must sign a form when you purchase a handgun saying that you understand you will be held criminally liable if a minor gains access to your firearms and does anything bad with them.
Hopefully some inflated prosecutor doesn't go after mom with a bogus charge like that.
My 2 cents
Good point, makes you wonder if the boy will end up with a criminal record for defending his sister......ocgso wrote:Notice too that there was no follow-up on the boy being taken to a detention center either.protias wrote:The kids did a good job. I just hope the mom doesn't get charged with leaving a loaded firearm near where a minor can get a hold of it.
And that is the problem in many states....
In NC, you must sign a form when you purchase a handgun saying that you understand you will be held criminally liable if a minor gains access to your firearms and does anything bad with them.
Hopefully some inflated prosecutor doesn't go after mom with a bogus charge like that.
My 2 cents
Yata hey
Was it the boy who shot the intruder that got taken to the detention center, or the juvenile that was with the two BG's?ocgso wrote:Notice too that there was no follow-up on the boy being taken to a detention center either.protias wrote:The kids did a good job. I just hope the mom doesn't get charged with leaving a loaded firearm near where a minor can get a hold of it.
And that is the problem in many states....
In NC, you must sign a form when you purchase a handgun saying that you understand you will be held criminally liable if a minor gains access to your firearms and does anything bad with them.
Hopefully some inflated prosecutor doesn't go after mom with a bogus charge like that.
My 2 cents
Yata hey
Good point - it wasn't clear.Grapeshot wrote:Was it the boy who shot the intruder that got taken to the detention center, or the juvenile that was with the two BG's?Notice too that there was no follow-up on the boy being taken to a detention center either.
Yata hey
I guess we'll just have to wait for the brady bunch to issue their statement about this for the real facts to come out.:quirkybuster81 wrote:Good point - it wasn't clear.Grapeshot wrote:Was it the boy who shot the intruder that got taken to the detention center, or the juvenile that was with the two BG's?Notice too that there was no follow-up on the boy being taken to a detention center either.
Yata hey
Either way though - no follow up.
Yata hey